During the Paris Olympics, female Taiwanese boxer Lin Yu-ting (林郁婷) was the subject of a gender dispute.
The International Boxing Association (IBA) called her gender into question despite having no evidence. The International Olympics Committee (IOC) last year revoked its recognition of the IBA due to its failure to implement governance reforms.
Such attacks run counter to the Olympic spirit of fair competition.
At the end of 2021, the IOC announced a new “Framework on Fairness, Inclusion and Non-Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity and Sex Variations,” with 10 principles aimed at urging the international community to strive toward eliminating gender discrimination.
The first principle emphasizes inclusion, stating that there should be no discrimination in sports and event organizers must ensure a fair competitive environment.
The third principle states that eligibility criteria must not systematically exclude athletes from competition based on their gender identity or sex variations. Without evidence, athletes should not be subject to testing for the purpose of determining their gender identity or sex variations.
If eligibility is dependent on gender differences and disputes arise about whether a contestant is biologically female, the sixth principle outlines using evidence-based approaches.
To avoid unfair competition caused by closed-room decisions, eligibility criteria proposed by the event organizer must be subject to peer review.
Physically, legally and under IOC regulations, Lin is a woman. Any questioning of her gender is not only discrimination, but also undermines the legal systems of Taiwan and the IOC. The IBA stripped Lin of her bronze medal at last year’s Women’s World Boxing Championships under the pretext that she had failed a gender eligibility test.
However, no reliable evidence has so far been provided regarding its testing method, process and results. The IBA has also not allowed a third party review. This raises concerns about whether certain athletes have been targeted and treated differently, which is a serious contravention of the IOC’s principles of fairness, inclusion and non-discrimination.
With the IBA launching attacks toward Lin, Taiwan should be her strongest supporter. As the governing body, the Sports Administration should bring the case before the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne, Switzerland. Any ruling made by the court would be legally binding for all parties involved and apply to all IOC members and international sports organizations.
Although the process might be cumbersome and time-consuming, inaction would allow discrimination to persist, leaving Taiwan’s athletes to suffer in silence.
Wu Ching-chin is a professor in Aletheia University’s Department of Law and director of the university’s Criminal Law Research Center.
Translated by Nicole Wong
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
RSS