To promote the use of renewable energy sources, the government allows developers to turn agricultural land into solar farms, but the policy has been criticized for reducing the availability of fertile land.
The National Property Administration has approved a 600 hectare plot of agricultural land in Changhua County’s Fangyuan Township (芳苑) to be developed by five solar energy companies Farmers are protesting the decision.
In 2022, the proportion of energy generated from sustainable sources in Japan reached almost 25 percent. Solar capacity accounted for more than 10 percent of the total at 85 gigawatts, which was behind only China and the US.
There is “coopetition” — competitive cooperation — between the agriculture and solar power sectors for the use of land amid the energy transition in Japan, and there are concerns that solar panels might harm crops.
However, years of experimentation and implementation have proved that crops can grow well as long as solar farms are well designed. More than 50 kinds of fruits and vegetables had no problem in the experiments.
Tokyo has designed two pathways of energy transition: One is to permanently change the use of farmland to generating solar power; the other is to allow farming and solar generation to coexist.
Even given the small scale of power generation, the latter is considered more popular, as it creates value in agricultural landscapes, bringing them back to life and attracting young people to return to their hometowns.
This makes it a win-win situation for farmers and solar firms.
Taiwan’s nuclear-free homeland policy and the goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2050 have driven the development of green energy. Solar panels are scattered across farmlands and fish ponds after the rapid expansion of solar projects.
Although this has contributed significantly to the efficiency of the power supply, it comes at a cost: sacrificing agricultural development, and worsening the self-sufficiency rate for grain production.
Striking a balance is the key to a win-win situation.
Dino Wei is an engineer.
Translated by Fion Khan
War, possibly global, will define the coming decade — so it is crucial that Taiwanese decide now what their freedom and their lives are worth — perhaps starting with a defense budget of 5 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The force that threatens Taiwan, the Communist Party of China (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), asserts that a free, or even worse, an “independent” Taiwan is the greatest threat to the CCP’s dictatorship. Accordingly, they are prepared to kill Taiwanese by the millions, which also will initiate their longer war against democracies. Should it succeed, Chinese sources are all but openly
Vincent Gao (高志凱), vice president of the Center for China and Globalization and former interpreter for Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) recently gave an interview with al-Jazeera’s Mehdi Hasan in which Gao appeared overwhelmed on multiple occasions. When asked about sensitive topics such as Taiwan and Xinjiang, Gao attempted to adhere to the official position of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but quickly succumbed to Hasan’s precise and consistent questioning, which exposed the flaws in the CCP’s positions. His views on unification with Taiwan were also widely criticized. Throughout the interview, Gao reiterated the importance of “one China.” He said it is “not
Amid China’s escalating military harassment of Taiwan, a teaser released on July 23 of the new TV series Zero Day (零日攻擊), a local production portraying a Chinese attack on Taiwan, attracted more than 1 million views in a week, sparking an emotional response and discussions across the nation. Partly funded by the government and scheduled to air next year, ‘Zero Day’ depicts a Chinese warplane disappearing in the Taiwan Strait and China using the search as an excuse to mount a naval blockade of Taiwan and launch an invasion. The 17-minute trailer shows clips how Beijing could increase its choke hold
A new, multipolar world is already forming out of the post-Cold War unipolar US hegemony. Certain idealists envision a world of multiple, regional hegemons: benevolent — or at the very least reasonable and fair — dominant powers ensuring that the interests of the nations within their sphere of influence are observed. According to this naive point of view, this new ordering of the world would be humanity’s best hope for peace and stability. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and Russian President Vladimir Putin, rejecting the dominant US or Western world order, are vocal advocates of multipolarity, and the primary drivers creating