No turning back on nuclear
No matter whether you are on a train traveling along Taiwan’s western coast or flying above in an airplane, you are likely to notice the scenery outside your window.
Over the past three years, the biggest development you are likely to notice is that there is a growing number of solar panel roof installations on homes and factories and “groves” of offshore wind turbines.
Previously, it was only a handful of onshore turbines next to beaches. The renewable energy transformation is well underway.
On Sunday last week, while taking a short train ride from Kaohsiung Station to Hsin-ying Station in Tainan’s Sinying Township (新營), I saw a small school next to the railway. Heping Elementary School’s roof was covered in solar panels.
There are still many universities that have not even installed a single panel. Such a tiny school was able to do better than them.
After conducting a simple Internet search on this school, something astonishing turned up — I found that the school had installed the solar panels way back in 2008. The school was not just simply following a fad.
They were a community pioneer in transitioning to renewable energy sources.
The train continued lurching forward as it left the station. High-voltage pylons slowly came into view. The Longci ultra-high voltage substation appeared just 30 minutes into the journey.
The national March 3 power outages in 2022 started at this southern power supply hub. It is not an overstatement to say that Longci is the most important power substation in Taiwan.
The installation was Southeast Asia’s largest ultra-high voltage substation, a news report said at the time of its completion in 1981.
If we compare renewable transition to a “large power plant and large grid,” it is a long way before the nation reaches the point of having an extensive smart grid.
Fortunately, after three power outages, the government has proposed a plan to transition the power grid to a distributed “smart grid,” tying together the intermittency of renewables’ socialized characteristics.
The transition to a system of renewables also appears to be progressing.
Although the administrations of former presidents Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) had a renewables platform agenda, it was all for nothing. Taiwan’s road to renewable energy transition only officially began in 2016.
There have been a few impassioned proponents of nuclear power in the past few years.
However, they are stoking the anxieties of workers and business owners.
They use simplistic logic, such as “a stop to nuclear power would mean power cuts, and power cuts mean a need for nuclear power,” to cast doubt on the importance of renewables for the nation’s energy.
The electric system includes the production, transportation, adaptation and sale of energy systems.
Electric systems specialists have long made it clear that in Taiwan, the classic example of renewables system transitions has been widespread much earlier than initially thought.
Taiwan cannot and does not possess the legal proscriptions to turn back the clock.
Conservatives who protect nuclear power are intentionally manipulating people’s fears of power outages.
This is only because there is only one way forward in their minds.
Chen Wei-chih
Taipei
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS