Minnesota Governor and Democratic US vice presidential candidate Tim Walz has connections to China dating back decades that could help inform US Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ approach to the world’s second-biggest economy, but might also spell trouble with leaders in Beijing and Republicans back home.
The little-known Minnesota governor taught English in China’s southern Guangdong Province in 1989 and 1990, making him the first person on a presidential ticket to have that kind of experience living in the country since former US president George H.W. Bush, who served as US ambassador in Beijing in the 1970s. Walz has often spoken affectionately about Chinese.
“If they had the proper leadership, there are no limits on what they could accomplish,” he told a local newspaper after returning from China in 1990. “They are such kind, generous, capable people.”
Walz got married on the fifth anniversary of the deadly 1989 Tiananmen Square military crackdown, with his wife Gwen telling a local newspaper: “He wanted to have a date he’ll always remember.”
He has also posted on social media that he had a “life-changing” lunch with the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan spiritual leader exiled by China.
His interest in the country has also extended to policymaking, with Walz cosponsoring numerous pieces of legislation in the US House of Representatives including the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2017.
Walz was the only Democratic lawmaker in the House of Representatives willing to support the bill, said Jeffrey Ngo (敖卓軒), a former youth activist from Hong Kong, adding he “knocked on every door” to seek backing for it.
Ngo said he met Walz in 2016 along with fellow democracy advocate Joshua Wong (黃之鋒) and was impressed by the congressman’s knowledge of Hong Kong and China issues.
“This guy really knew his stuff,” said Ngo, now a research fellow at US-based advocacy group Hong Kong Democracy Council.
“He’s rare among members of Congress because he’s actually been to China so many times,” he added.
Walz also cosponsored numerous resolutions, including those condemning China’s censorship of the killings around Tiananmen Square in 1989 and ones expressing concern about the treatment of Falun Gong practitioners.
With Walz appearing prominently on the national political scene for the first time on Tuesday last week, many on social media began poring over a long record of comments on China, some of them decades old.
“I don’t fall into the category that China necessarily needs to be an adversarial relationship,” Walz said in a video interview posted in 2016 that focused mainly on agriculture that is now being reposted on X. “I totally disagree, and I think we need to stand firm, on what they’re doing in the South China Sea. But there’s many areas of cooperation that we can work on.”
At the same time, his views on China have tracked a familiar evolution from hope that an economic opening up would lead to greater political freedoms to frustration about what he has called China’s worsening human-rights record. His positions appear largely in sync with the approach of the administration of US President Joe Biden that aims to compete with Beijing in military and economic spheres, and cooperate where possible on climate or narcotics trafficking.
“I think the idea was, with a free market economy, we’d see a more opening of the Chinese grip on — on social life and on human rights,” Walz said in a US congressional hearing in 2016. “That simply has not occurred.”
Walz’s stance toward China — and his past meeting with the Dalai Lama — might open him to criticism from Beijing.
However, a Chinese official, who asked not to be identified, said the choice of Walz is unlikely to impact Washington’s policy as US politicians are unified in their hardline views on China.
In Beijing’s view, every candidate believes untrue and harmful things about China, the official said.
On the other hand, some of the governor’s more nuanced takes on the country from his trips could leave him open to Republican attacks during a tight race for the White House at a time when the China relationship is much more confrontational.
While China appears to be a personal issue for Walz, that is only good “to a point” and does not reflect the “zero-sum competition” between the US and China, said Michael Sobolik, a senior fellow at the American Foreign Policy Council and author of Countering China’s Great Game: A Strategy for American Dominance.
“The Chinese people aren’t Americans’ enemies, and Walz understands that basic reality — on the other hand, Walz seems overly optimistic, almost Pollyannish, about Washington’s struggle with the Chinese Communist Party,” Sobolik said. “Like President Biden and Vice President Harris, Walz seems to reject a cold war framing for US-China relations. That’s a bad thing.”
Spokespeople for Walz did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Tuesday last week.
“I lived in China, I’ve been there about 30 times,” Walz said back in 2016. “But if someone tells you they’re an expert on China they’re probably not telling you the truth, because it’s a complex country.”
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
Deflation in China is persisting, raising growing concerns domestically and internationally. Beijing’s stimulus policies introduced in September last year have largely been short-lived in financial markets and negligible in the real economy. Recent data showing disproportionately low bank loan growth relative to the expansion of the money supply suggest the limited effectiveness of the measures. Many have urged the government to take more decisive action, particularly through fiscal expansion, to avoid a deep deflationary spiral akin to Japan’s experience in the early 1990s. While Beijing’s policy choices remain uncertain, questions abound about the possible endgame for the Chinese economy if no decisive
RSS