The rain brought by Typhoon Gaemi flooded several farms. Residual pesticides and chemical fertilizers were washed off, eventually being deposited in the soil of nearby organic farms and affecting the production and quality of organic produce.
Taiwan’s farming sector is mostly made up of small farms. Tilled lands are generally narrow and fragmentary small organic farms that are often a stone’s throw away from tracts of land used for conventional farming, which are doused with pesticides and chemical fertilizers. Despite organic farmers doing their best to separate their land and water sources, all farmland exists within an open environment. All it takes is a typhoon to cause flooding and organically cultivated produce is easily polluted.
The Organic Agriculture Promotion Act (有機農業促進法) states that organic farms must comply with the standard values for soil used for growing edible produce and the quality standards for irrigation water. Organic farms must avoid heavy metal contamination of soil and irrigation water, and prevent contamination by “prohibited substances” such as pesticides and chemical fertilizers.
Moreover, organic produce must be inspected and verified. If farmers can obtain certification, then their produce can be sold with an “organic” label.
Consumers are willing to spend more to buy organically grown produce. They want to consume healthy agricultural produce that has undergone safety checks. If organic products fail to meet certification standards, why would consumers pay an arm and a leg for them?
Agricultural agencies should help advise organic farms affected by flooding from Typhoon Gaemi, and conduct comprehensive inspections. If farmers’ fields have been contaminated, agencies should be able to ask farmers to reverify their organic farming status to protect the reputation of organic produce and guarantee consumer rights.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a secretary at the Pingtung Public Health Bureau.
Translated by Tim Smith
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS