The rain brought by Typhoon Gaemi flooded several farms. Residual pesticides and chemical fertilizers were washed off, eventually being deposited in the soil of nearby organic farms and affecting the production and quality of organic produce.
Taiwan’s farming sector is mostly made up of small farms. Tilled lands are generally narrow and fragmentary small organic farms that are often a stone’s throw away from tracts of land used for conventional farming, which are doused with pesticides and chemical fertilizers. Despite organic farmers doing their best to separate their land and water sources, all farmland exists within an open environment. All it takes is a typhoon to cause flooding and organically cultivated produce is easily polluted.
The Organic Agriculture Promotion Act (有機農業促進法) states that organic farms must comply with the standard values for soil used for growing edible produce and the quality standards for irrigation water. Organic farms must avoid heavy metal contamination of soil and irrigation water, and prevent contamination by “prohibited substances” such as pesticides and chemical fertilizers.
Moreover, organic produce must be inspected and verified. If farmers can obtain certification, then their produce can be sold with an “organic” label.
Consumers are willing to spend more to buy organically grown produce. They want to consume healthy agricultural produce that has undergone safety checks. If organic products fail to meet certification standards, why would consumers pay an arm and a leg for them?
Agricultural agencies should help advise organic farms affected by flooding from Typhoon Gaemi, and conduct comprehensive inspections. If farmers’ fields have been contaminated, agencies should be able to ask farmers to reverify their organic farming status to protect the reputation of organic produce and guarantee consumer rights.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a secretary at the Pingtung Public Health Bureau.
Translated by Tim Smith
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed