Pegatron Group chairman Tung Tzu-hsien (童子賢) has strongly advocated for the continued use of nuclear power in Taiwan to supplement the transition to renewable energy sources, portraying himself as a missionary spreading the good news.
In a June 20 report on energy allocation and development, Tung laid out his concerns regarding global warming, a low-cost stable power supply, the effectiveness of Taiwan’s carbon reduction efforts and the possible environmental impact of developing renewable energy sources.
Unfortunately, his use of false data, which has already been fact-checked, makes him more like a rumormonger spreading fake news. It is clear that the misinformation comes from pro-nuclear advocates who are out of touch with reality.
Tung has even publicly compared nuclear waste to a wild beast in a cage, seemingly dangerous, but actually of no jeopardy to the public. This received praise from nuclear supporters and fueled rumors that the government is reluctant to deal with nuclear waste. Once dealt with, there would be no reason to stop using nuclear power, they say.
The problem is that proponents of nuclear power misunderstand the nature of waste disposal. They discuss the issue from technological, economic or environmental perspectives, but fail to realize that nuclear energy is a social issue in Taiwan. Most baffling is that they continue to spread false information that using nuclear power to reduce carbon emissions is the only cure-all for climate change and energy problems.
We should be asking the important questions: Can Taiwan’s nuclear power plants withstand frequent earthquakes? Can the possibility of a nuclear disaster be ruled out? How should nuclear waste, which remains toxic for thousands of years, be dealt with? However, nuclear supporters conveniently turn a deaf ear to these concerns, dismissing them with a smile.
Tung does not like political manipulation, but he seems to have been accepted by pro-nuclear advocates as a “nuclear-loving” pioneer and forgotten that he is heading Taiwan’s carbon reduction initiative. Tung and others see nuclear power as superior to renewable energy sources, implying that the latter have many environmental and ecological problems of their own. Are there no other solutions?
Taiwan has already implemented plans and achieved concrete results in creating a circular economy, as well as in areas such as land planning, sustainable agriculture, environmental protection and tourism.
The nation should work together to find even more comprehensive and feasible approaches.
It must be acknowledged that, like nuclear power plants, the construction and operation of renewable energy plants produce pollutants and waste that are not completely harmless, but after weighing every issue, including Taiwan’s small, densely populated area, frequent earthquakes and societal risk tolerance, it is clear that the positive impacts of renewable energy are far greater than those of nuclear power.
We must keep a practical mindset in facing the challenge of ensuring a stable electricity supply and achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050. Using nuclear power to reduce carbon emissions is not a magic solution.
To ensure Taiwan’s sustainable future and fulfill carbon reduction goals to combat global warming, renewable energy development and energy conservation is the way to go.
Lin Ren-bin is an academic committee member of the Taiwan Environmental Protection Union.
Translated by Nicole Wong
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS