Ann Kao (高虹安) was suspended as mayor of Hsinchu following her conviction on corruption charges. Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) in an interview on Tuesday last week said that Kao’s loss of her civil servant role meant she would need an alternative source of income. Moreover, Kao needs money for lawyers, so Ko “feared that he would need to support her financially.”
Democratic Progressive Party New Taipei City Legislator Cho Kuan-ting (卓冠廷) posted on Facebook details from Kao’s bank statements, which showed that she had NT$18.1 million (US$557,953) in savings and no debt, throwing doubt on the idea that she would need financial support.
What is more perplexing is that during his time as Taipei mayor, Ko abolished the Taipei Department of Social Welfare’s practice of distributing cash gifts of NT$1,500 to elderly people on Double Ninth Festival.
Ko’s petty haggle over NT$1,500 to elderly people puts into perspective his contrasting attitude toward Kao, a young, well-educated woman whose net worth is nearly NT$20 million. Ko is a reverse Robin Hood.
Moreover, Kao has expressed her desire to cut ties with the TPP, announcing her resignation from the party on July 26, the day the court issued its verdict.
Ko is in no position to support Kao financially and even if she needed money, the responsibility would fall on her boyfriend, Lee Chung-ting (李忠庭).
What is Ko trying to gain from the situation? He has garnered considerable wealth from elections. In this year’s presidential election, Ko filled his pockets with NT$110 million in election subsidies and NT$340 million in political donations. Voicing an offer to support Kao is just Ko’s attempt to take advantage of her situation and draw attention to himself.
Sophia Lee is a member of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Wang Yun-fei
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means