Former Bangladeshi prime minister Sheikh Hasina could have left gracefully. Instead, she resigned and fled to neighboring India, ending her 15-year-long rule as chaos has engulfed the nation.
The nation needs a swift path to a peaceful transfer of power. Any delay would risk damaging its reputation with the international financial community even further — at a time when Dhaka needs funds and investment to revive its flailing economy. Stability in a region that has long lived under the shadow of violent extremism is also under threat, while the chaos would present an opportunity for China, whose ambitions have so far been well-balanced against India’s under Hasina’s regime.
Once among the most impoverished nations in the world, Bangladesh has witnessed a remarkable turnaround. A young and energetic workforce helped make it the world’s second-largest clothing exporter behind China, manufacturing for large fashion brands such as Hennes & Mauritz, Gap and Inditex’s Zara. In 2022, it was on course to become a US$1 trillion economy by 2040, according to the Boston Consulting Group.
The good times did not last. A combination of the COVID-19 pandemic and financial mismanagement took their toll on the emerging economy, and two years ago it reached out to the IMF and other international lenders to prevent collapse. It is the third nation in the region, after Sri Lanka and Pakistan, forced to knock on the IMF’s door. All the instability is adding to uncertainty in South Asia.
Financial health was not the only issue. The political protests over the past month have been a lightning rod for a wide range of problems from acute unemployment to a flagging private sector, said Lutfey Siddiqi, visiting professor at the London School of Economics and Political Science’s foreign policy think tank.
“There’s also anger at the sheer lack of empathy and condescension with which Hasina has responded to those worries,” he said.
The prime minister’s Awami League had been in power since 2009, but elections have been regularly boycotted by the opposition, and widely condemned as being insufficiently free and fair. She capitalized on a storied legacy as the daughter of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, Bangladesh’s founding father, going on to become the world’s longest-serving female leader, but has clamped down on press freedom and quashed public debate. Economic mismanagement has only made grievances worse.
Her entrance into political life was marked by personal tragedy. Hasina’s father was assassinated in a military coup in 1975, when she was 28. The army murdered 18 people that day, including her parents and three siblings. Hasina, who was in Germany at the time, fled to India with her sister and lived there in exile until she returned to her homeland in the 1980s. She was in and out of home detention until 1996, when she first became prime minister.
Hasina was credited for bringing much-needed stability and turning the economy around, but in the past decade her rule was marked by protests against an increasingly authoritarian regime. Then police launched a brutal crackdown on demonstrators who have been on the streets since June to voice their discontent over a proposed government jobs quota. More than 100 people died last weekend, adding to the toll of at least 300 since citizen anger flared. The rage has morphed into something deeper — a disillusionment with the government that many among the 170 million strong population view as corrupt and ineffective.
There are regional implications for Hasina’s dramatic exit. It puts renewed pressure on India, which has relied on her to keep potential terrorist threats at bay, as well as provide a bulwark to China’s growing influence in the region. New Delhi will be worried about who will replace her and what that would mean for security risks on its border, and the new government’s relations with Beijing.
China is Bangladesh’s largest trading partner. In 2022, trade between the two grew by 10.7 percent to US$27.79 billion from US$12 billion in 2014. Dhaka was the first South Asian nation to join the Belt and Road Initiative, Beijing’s ambitious global infrastructure program. Bangladesh last month asked for a US$5 billion loan from Beijing to help it grow its economy. In the current power vacuum, the US would be mindful of China’s appeal. US officials have for too long turned a blind eye to Hasina’s growing autocracy in an attempt to keep her on side. That could come back to haunt them.
For now though, it will be domestic considerations that dominate — and rightly so. The nation has to begin the difficult process of rebuilding. The first tasks for a new government would be quelling the protests and steadying the economy. Negotiations with the IMF for more funds in the face of dwindling foreign-exchange reserves should be a priority. The people of Bangladesh have spoken, and they want a bigger say in their future. It is time they got it.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS