Former Bangladeshi prime minister Sheikh Hasina could have left gracefully. Instead, she resigned and fled to neighboring India, ending her 15-year-long rule as chaos has engulfed the nation.
The nation needs a swift path to a peaceful transfer of power. Any delay would risk damaging its reputation with the international financial community even further — at a time when Dhaka needs funds and investment to revive its flailing economy. Stability in a region that has long lived under the shadow of violent extremism is also under threat, while the chaos would present an opportunity for China, whose ambitions have so far been well-balanced against India’s under Hasina’s regime.
Once among the most impoverished nations in the world, Bangladesh has witnessed a remarkable turnaround. A young and energetic workforce helped make it the world’s second-largest clothing exporter behind China, manufacturing for large fashion brands such as Hennes & Mauritz, Gap and Inditex’s Zara. In 2022, it was on course to become a US$1 trillion economy by 2040, according to the Boston Consulting Group.
The good times did not last. A combination of the COVID-19 pandemic and financial mismanagement took their toll on the emerging economy, and two years ago it reached out to the IMF and other international lenders to prevent collapse. It is the third nation in the region, after Sri Lanka and Pakistan, forced to knock on the IMF’s door. All the instability is adding to uncertainty in South Asia.
Financial health was not the only issue. The political protests over the past month have been a lightning rod for a wide range of problems from acute unemployment to a flagging private sector, said Lutfey Siddiqi, visiting professor at the London School of Economics and Political Science’s foreign policy think tank.
“There’s also anger at the sheer lack of empathy and condescension with which Hasina has responded to those worries,” he said.
The prime minister’s Awami League had been in power since 2009, but elections have been regularly boycotted by the opposition, and widely condemned as being insufficiently free and fair. She capitalized on a storied legacy as the daughter of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, Bangladesh’s founding father, going on to become the world’s longest-serving female leader, but has clamped down on press freedom and quashed public debate. Economic mismanagement has only made grievances worse.
Her entrance into political life was marked by personal tragedy. Hasina’s father was assassinated in a military coup in 1975, when she was 28. The army murdered 18 people that day, including her parents and three siblings. Hasina, who was in Germany at the time, fled to India with her sister and lived there in exile until she returned to her homeland in the 1980s. She was in and out of home detention until 1996, when she first became prime minister.
Hasina was credited for bringing much-needed stability and turning the economy around, but in the past decade her rule was marked by protests against an increasingly authoritarian regime. Then police launched a brutal crackdown on demonstrators who have been on the streets since June to voice their discontent over a proposed government jobs quota. More than 100 people died last weekend, adding to the toll of at least 300 since citizen anger flared. The rage has morphed into something deeper — a disillusionment with the government that many among the 170 million strong population view as corrupt and ineffective.
There are regional implications for Hasina’s dramatic exit. It puts renewed pressure on India, which has relied on her to keep potential terrorist threats at bay, as well as provide a bulwark to China’s growing influence in the region. New Delhi will be worried about who will replace her and what that would mean for security risks on its border, and the new government’s relations with Beijing.
China is Bangladesh’s largest trading partner. In 2022, trade between the two grew by 10.7 percent to US$27.79 billion from US$12 billion in 2014. Dhaka was the first South Asian nation to join the Belt and Road Initiative, Beijing’s ambitious global infrastructure program. Bangladesh last month asked for a US$5 billion loan from Beijing to help it grow its economy. In the current power vacuum, the US would be mindful of China’s appeal. US officials have for too long turned a blind eye to Hasina’s growing autocracy in an attempt to keep her on side. That could come back to haunt them.
For now though, it will be domestic considerations that dominate — and rightly so. The nation has to begin the difficult process of rebuilding. The first tasks for a new government would be quelling the protests and steadying the economy. Negotiations with the IMF for more funds in the face of dwindling foreign-exchange reserves should be a priority. The people of Bangladesh have spoken, and they want a bigger say in their future. It is time they got it.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
Historically, in Taiwan, and in present-day China, many people advocate the idea of a “great Chinese nation.” It is not worth arguing with extremists to say that the so-called “great Chinese nation” is a fabricated political myth rather than an academic term. Rather, they should read the following excerpt from Chinese writer Lin Yutang’s (林語堂) book My Country and My People: “It is also inevitable that I should offend many writers about China, especially my own countrymen and great patriots. These great patriots — I have nothing to do with them, for their god is not my god, and their patriotism is
RSS