The TPP’s decline
Following the Jan. 13 presidential and legislative elections, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was pleased to see the TPP garner 22 percent of the party vote, double the 11 percent it achieved four years earlier. This was in sharp contrast to the fate of minor parties in the past, which at most won 10 percent before going into decline. Ko thought this meant that the TPP would not fizzle out and would be a third force in the local political arena.
However, Ann Kao (高虹安), who ran and was elected as mayor of Hsinchu City on behalf of the TPP, has been sentenced to seven years and four months in prison on corruption charges and dismissed from office.
Ko himself faces judicial investigation with regard to three major cases that took place during his tenure as Taipei mayor. These have raised doubts about the “squeaky-clean” image that the TPP has sought to cultivate.
The latest public opinion poll published by National Chengchi University’s Election Study Center showed that public support for the TPP has crumbled to 6.2 percent from 16.8 percent last year. If this triggers an effect of young people drifting away from the TPP, it would be the party’s biggest crisis since its founding in 2019.
Many supporters of the “blue” Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) think that if the alliance between the “blue” camp and the “white” TPP continues to split, the “green” Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would reap the benefits and remain in power.
The party with the most to fear if the TPP fizzles out is the KMT, because young voters are likely to switch their support to the DPP. Such a scenario would mess up the KMT’s electoral campaign strategy of squeezing the DPP by using the TPP to draw young people’s votes away from it.
The TPP has from the outset been a “one-person party” launched by Ko on the foundation of “online public opinion.” However, his online presence has since been eclipsed by TPP caucus convener Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌).
Besides, political decisions are based on considerations about public affairs that involve many complicated aspects. Politics is different from general business behavior or show business. It boils down to a “political instinct reality show” where politicians must accept the real test of public opinion.
Ko’s performance during his tenure as Taipei mayor was often among the poorest of his peers, so for residents of Taipei at least, Ko is well past his sell-by date.
Ko has frequently been at odds with the DPP government as he sought to shed his “green” connections to build up a “white” alternative. He thought that his “white new politics” would be a middle way that transcends the “blue” and “green” camps. However, Ko forgot that the TPP has always been a body without a soul, rather like a political scarecrow. The party has never had any defining ideology or core values and has now become a junior partner of the KMT.
It remains to be seen whether the TPP fizzles out, but one thing we can say for sure is that the post-Ko era has already arrived.
Wu Yi-han
Taipei
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Former Fijian prime minister Mahendra Chaudhry spoke at the Yushan Forum in Taipei on Monday, saying that while global conflicts were causing economic strife in the world, Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy (NSP) serves as a stabilizing force in the Indo-Pacific region and offers strategic opportunities for small island nations such as Fiji, as well as support in the fields of public health, education, renewable energy and agricultural technology. Taiwan does not have official diplomatic relations with Fiji, but it is one of the small island nations covered by the NSP. Chaudhry said that Fiji, as a sovereign nation, should support
RSS