Japan’s and China’s top diplomats met on the sidelines of the ASEAN Regional Forum on July 26, hoping to increase exchanges that promote mutually beneficial relations. However, the Chinese ministry misquoted the Japanese official’s comments on the “one China” issue, further fueling tensions between two sides.
Japanese Minister for Foreign Affairs Yoko Kamikawa and her Chinese counterpart, Wang Yi (王毅), had their first one-on-one talk in eight months on the sidelines of a gathering of foreign ministers in Laos to discuss issues between the two sides, including Japanese nationals being detained in China, Beijing’s bans on Japanese food imports and Japan’s semiconductor curbs.
After the meeting, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs released a statement saying “the Japanese foreign minister said that Japan’s adherence to the One China policy has not changed.”
That was different from the Japanese foreign ministry’s statement, which said that the Japanese minister expressed serious concern about the intensification of China’s military activities in areas surrounding Japan, and reiterated the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.
Kamikawa said China’s statement did not cite her words at the meeting correctly and reiterated that Japan has not changed its stance on Taiwan, which has long been consistent with the “ Joint Communique of the Government of Japan and the Government of the People’s Republic of China” issued in 1972.
“The Government of the People’s Republic of China [PRC] reiterates that Taiwan is an inalienable part of the territory of the People’s Republic of China. The Government of Japan fully ‘understands’ and ‘respects’ this stand of the Government of the People’s Republic of China,” the document states.
Only 51 countries — not 180 as Beijing says — fully comply with China’s “one China principle,” while 16 “acknowledge” China’s claims, nine “recognize” the claims and some “respect” it, a study by National University of Singapore assistant professor Chong Ja Ian (莊嘉穎) found.
Meanwhile, 27 do not recognize the PRC as the sole legal government of China nor do they mention Taiwan’s sovereignty in official documents, the study showed.
China has long attempted to distort international perceptions of Taiwan through its cognitive and legal warfare. Its moves have also escalated and gotten more daring and arrogant. However, those could cause more nations and politicians to underline ambiguity and doubt about Beijing’s claims over Taiwan.
At least eight lawmakers from other countries, including Bolivia, Colombia, Slovakia, North Macedonia and Bosnia, said that they had been pressured by Chinese diplomats not to attend the annual meeting of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC) that was held in Taiwan on July 30.
China’s move was “unprecedented,” “massively overstepping” and “unacceptable,” IPAC said.
To oppose China’s acts of intimidation, about 50 parliamentarians from 23 countries and the European Parliament participating at this year’s summit officially invited Taiwan to be a member of the alliance and collectively voted to pass a “ Model Resolution on 2758” against China’s distortion of UN Resolution 2758, which merely said the PRC was the representative of China to the UN, but did not mention Taiwan, address its political status nor establish PRC sovereignty over Taiwan.
The IPAC members — more than 250 cross-party members from 40 countries — said they would seek to pass the model resolution in their respective parliaments to redress China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution and inappropriate linkage to its “one China principle.”
The diplomatic incidents caused by China have obviously dealt more blows to its campaign against Taiwan and Beijing has gotten itself into more predicaments internationally.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS