Despite robust labor regulations, Latin American countries have exceptionally high turnover rates. Roughly 24 to 44 percent of workers in Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador, Mexico, Paraguay and Peru quit each year, and 30 to 50 percent of them exit the workforce.
Of course, workers vary in education levels, commitment to finding employment, compatibility with their positions and willingness to accept job offers, but the high turnover rates can be largely attributed to the unregulated informal sector, which accounts for more than 40 percent of the workforce in many Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries. The lifespan of informal jobs tends to be significantly shorter than that of formal jobs, owing to the lack of adequate regulations and benefits.
Of course, not all transitions are bad. Moving from low to high-productivity jobs, for example, can boost wages, especially early in a worker’s career, and help them secure better, more stable jobs with opportunities for promotion.
However, in many economies, younger and less-educated workers tend to change jobs more often. Consequently, they receive less training, on-the-job learning and experience; suffer slower wage growth and are more likely to move from formal jobs to the informal sector or leave the workforce altogether. In this way, high turnover can impede human-capital accumulation.
Given that job transitions are more common in the informal sector, it is reasonable to expect that Latin America’s high turnover rates will exacerbate labor-market inequalities in the long run, but so far, there has been little empirical evidence to support this view.
In a recent study, my coauthor, Naercio Menezes-Filho, and I explore the relationship between employee turnover and wage inequality. By analyzing labor-mobility patterns in five Latin American countries — Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador and Mexico — we show that high turnover rates might indeed exacerbate existing wage inequalities.
At first glance, our findings suggest that workers who switch jobs experience faster annual wage growth than those who stay in their current positions, reflecting the immediate gains that finding new employment can provide. In line with previous studies, we find that younger people, in particular, benefit more from the positive effects of changing jobs. This is true even in the formal sector, where higher investment in human capital usually encourages employee retention.
By analyzing wage distributions, we were able to compare actual wage outcomes to hypothetical scenarios where individuals did not switch jobs. We found that job transitions can contribute to short-term declines in inequality, as they initially benefit lower earners and younger people, but as human capital accumulates, the benefits of job stability can outweigh those of seeking new positions. Consequently, those who frequently change jobs experience slower long-term wage growth.
Given that unskilled workers change jobs more often, this suggests that high turnover increases inequality in the long run.
To be sure, other factors, such as non-wage benefits, also play a crucial role. For example, after Brazilian firms introduced private health insurance, the country’s formal sector hired fewer workers and fired more due to increased labor costs. Similarly, the introduction of public healthcare for informal workers and unemployed people in Mexico has resulted in fewer people moving to the formal sector. Given that less-educated individuals and women are more likely to work in the informal economy, this has impeded efforts to reduce existing wage disparities.
Nevertheless, our empirical findings underscore the need to address the adverse economic effects of high turnover. While younger people benefit from changing roles in the short term, those who frequently change jobs tend to experience slower average wage growth. Informal workers, in particular, find it more difficult to move to high-skill, well-paid jobs. This limits their ability to accumulate human capital and likely impedes economic growth in LAC countries, where the informal sector employs a significant share of the population.
To reduce wage inequality, LAC governments should implement policies that create incentives for workers to shift from informal to formal employment.
Specifically, they should focus on removing barriers to formalization and creating an environment in which employees can develop new skills and advance to higher-quality, better-paying positions.
By facilitating positive turnover and encouraging investment in human capital, policymakers can lay the groundwork for a more equitable labor market.
Renata Narita is an associate professor of economics at the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS