Despite robust labor regulations, Latin American countries have exceptionally high turnover rates. Roughly 24 to 44 percent of workers in Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador, Mexico, Paraguay and Peru quit each year, and 30 to 50 percent of them exit the workforce.
Of course, workers vary in education levels, commitment to finding employment, compatibility with their positions and willingness to accept job offers, but the high turnover rates can be largely attributed to the unregulated informal sector, which accounts for more than 40 percent of the workforce in many Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries. The lifespan of informal jobs tends to be significantly shorter than that of formal jobs, owing to the lack of adequate regulations and benefits.
Of course, not all transitions are bad. Moving from low to high-productivity jobs, for example, can boost wages, especially early in a worker’s career, and help them secure better, more stable jobs with opportunities for promotion.
However, in many economies, younger and less-educated workers tend to change jobs more often. Consequently, they receive less training, on-the-job learning and experience; suffer slower wage growth and are more likely to move from formal jobs to the informal sector or leave the workforce altogether. In this way, high turnover can impede human-capital accumulation.
Given that job transitions are more common in the informal sector, it is reasonable to expect that Latin America’s high turnover rates will exacerbate labor-market inequalities in the long run, but so far, there has been little empirical evidence to support this view.
In a recent study, my coauthor, Naercio Menezes-Filho, and I explore the relationship between employee turnover and wage inequality. By analyzing labor-mobility patterns in five Latin American countries — Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador and Mexico — we show that high turnover rates might indeed exacerbate existing wage inequalities.
At first glance, our findings suggest that workers who switch jobs experience faster annual wage growth than those who stay in their current positions, reflecting the immediate gains that finding new employment can provide. In line with previous studies, we find that younger people, in particular, benefit more from the positive effects of changing jobs. This is true even in the formal sector, where higher investment in human capital usually encourages employee retention.
By analyzing wage distributions, we were able to compare actual wage outcomes to hypothetical scenarios where individuals did not switch jobs. We found that job transitions can contribute to short-term declines in inequality, as they initially benefit lower earners and younger people, but as human capital accumulates, the benefits of job stability can outweigh those of seeking new positions. Consequently, those who frequently change jobs experience slower long-term wage growth.
Given that unskilled workers change jobs more often, this suggests that high turnover increases inequality in the long run.
To be sure, other factors, such as non-wage benefits, also play a crucial role. For example, after Brazilian firms introduced private health insurance, the country’s formal sector hired fewer workers and fired more due to increased labor costs. Similarly, the introduction of public healthcare for informal workers and unemployed people in Mexico has resulted in fewer people moving to the formal sector. Given that less-educated individuals and women are more likely to work in the informal economy, this has impeded efforts to reduce existing wage disparities.
Nevertheless, our empirical findings underscore the need to address the adverse economic effects of high turnover. While younger people benefit from changing roles in the short term, those who frequently change jobs tend to experience slower average wage growth. Informal workers, in particular, find it more difficult to move to high-skill, well-paid jobs. This limits their ability to accumulate human capital and likely impedes economic growth in LAC countries, where the informal sector employs a significant share of the population.
To reduce wage inequality, LAC governments should implement policies that create incentives for workers to shift from informal to formal employment.
Specifically, they should focus on removing barriers to formalization and creating an environment in which employees can develop new skills and advance to higher-quality, better-paying positions.
By facilitating positive turnover and encouraging investment in human capital, policymakers can lay the groundwork for a more equitable labor market.
Renata Narita is an associate professor of economics at the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for