China still fears Taiwan
The outstanding performance of Taiwanese men’s badminton duo Wang Chi-lin (王齊麟) and Lee Yang (李洋) at the Paris Olympics has touched the hearts of countless Taiwanese. It also unintentionally revealed China’s sensitivity and fear of the name “Taiwan.”
State-run China Central Television (CCTV) canceled the broadcast of the badminton men’s doubles final for “sensitive reasons.” That not only caused an uproar among Taiwanese, but also highlighted China’s inconsistent and absurd approach to handling the “Taiwan” issue.
CCTV delayed the broadcast and did not start until the second game of the final match. The entire broadcast lasted just 40 minutes and did not include the medal ceremony.
When the broadcast was cut, Chinese sports commentator Sun Ningzhi (孫寧智) simply said there was “no signal.” That statement did not convince anyone. How could CCTV make such a basic error during such an important international event?
CCTV also deliberately did not broadcast Wang and Lee’s previous victory over another Chinese duo during the group stage of the tournament. The broadcaster’s “sensitive reasons” is just an excuse for political censorship and an attempt to cover up that it does not recognize Taiwan.
CCTV’s actions exposed the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) fear of Taiwan. Among audience members’ cheering for Taiwan during the match, one supporter held a poster with the phrase “Go Taiwan” written in Mandarin on it, before it was snatched away by a Chinese supporter.
The CCP is extremely wary of any display of a Taiwanese identity, but this cover-up attempt only reveals Beijing’s weakness and feigned confidence regarding Taiwan.
The Chinese government has long emphasized that “sports are sports and politics is politics,” but this incident makes it clear that it does not practice what it preaches. When sports involve Taiwan, the CCP unhesitatingly intervenes, putting political censorship over sportsmanship. This not only undermines fairness in sports, but also allows the international community to see China’s true colors.
Halting the broadcast once again proves China’s oversensitivity and irrationality toward Taiwan. It does nothing to help Taiwan-China relations and makes Beijing appear more closed off and authoritarian to the international community. Only by addressing Taiwan’s presence and embracing diverse values can China truly show its strength and maturity.
Anonymous
Taipei
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS