China still fears Taiwan
The outstanding performance of Taiwanese men’s badminton duo Wang Chi-lin (王齊麟) and Lee Yang (李洋) at the Paris Olympics has touched the hearts of countless Taiwanese. It also unintentionally revealed China’s sensitivity and fear of the name “Taiwan.”
State-run China Central Television (CCTV) canceled the broadcast of the badminton men’s doubles final for “sensitive reasons.” That not only caused an uproar among Taiwanese, but also highlighted China’s inconsistent and absurd approach to handling the “Taiwan” issue.
CCTV delayed the broadcast and did not start until the second game of the final match. The entire broadcast lasted just 40 minutes and did not include the medal ceremony.
When the broadcast was cut, Chinese sports commentator Sun Ningzhi (孫寧智) simply said there was “no signal.” That statement did not convince anyone. How could CCTV make such a basic error during such an important international event?
CCTV also deliberately did not broadcast Wang and Lee’s previous victory over another Chinese duo during the group stage of the tournament. The broadcaster’s “sensitive reasons” is just an excuse for political censorship and an attempt to cover up that it does not recognize Taiwan.
CCTV’s actions exposed the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) fear of Taiwan. Among audience members’ cheering for Taiwan during the match, one supporter held a poster with the phrase “Go Taiwan” written in Mandarin on it, before it was snatched away by a Chinese supporter.
The CCP is extremely wary of any display of a Taiwanese identity, but this cover-up attempt only reveals Beijing’s weakness and feigned confidence regarding Taiwan.
The Chinese government has long emphasized that “sports are sports and politics is politics,” but this incident makes it clear that it does not practice what it preaches. When sports involve Taiwan, the CCP unhesitatingly intervenes, putting political censorship over sportsmanship. This not only undermines fairness in sports, but also allows the international community to see China’s true colors.
Halting the broadcast once again proves China’s oversensitivity and irrationality toward Taiwan. It does nothing to help Taiwan-China relations and makes Beijing appear more closed off and authoritarian to the international community. Only by addressing Taiwan’s presence and embracing diverse values can China truly show its strength and maturity.
Anonymous
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS