China still fears Taiwan
The outstanding performance of Taiwanese men’s badminton duo Wang Chi-lin (王齊麟) and Lee Yang (李洋) at the Paris Olympics has touched the hearts of countless Taiwanese. It also unintentionally revealed China’s sensitivity and fear of the name “Taiwan.”
State-run China Central Television (CCTV) canceled the broadcast of the badminton men’s doubles final for “sensitive reasons.” That not only caused an uproar among Taiwanese, but also highlighted China’s inconsistent and absurd approach to handling the “Taiwan” issue.
CCTV delayed the broadcast and did not start until the second game of the final match. The entire broadcast lasted just 40 minutes and did not include the medal ceremony.
When the broadcast was cut, Chinese sports commentator Sun Ningzhi (孫寧智) simply said there was “no signal.” That statement did not convince anyone. How could CCTV make such a basic error during such an important international event?
CCTV also deliberately did not broadcast Wang and Lee’s previous victory over another Chinese duo during the group stage of the tournament. The broadcaster’s “sensitive reasons” is just an excuse for political censorship and an attempt to cover up that it does not recognize Taiwan.
CCTV’s actions exposed the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) fear of Taiwan. Among audience members’ cheering for Taiwan during the match, one supporter held a poster with the phrase “Go Taiwan” written in Mandarin on it, before it was snatched away by a Chinese supporter.
The CCP is extremely wary of any display of a Taiwanese identity, but this cover-up attempt only reveals Beijing’s weakness and feigned confidence regarding Taiwan.
The Chinese government has long emphasized that “sports are sports and politics is politics,” but this incident makes it clear that it does not practice what it preaches. When sports involve Taiwan, the CCP unhesitatingly intervenes, putting political censorship over sportsmanship. This not only undermines fairness in sports, but also allows the international community to see China’s true colors.
Halting the broadcast once again proves China’s oversensitivity and irrationality toward Taiwan. It does nothing to help Taiwan-China relations and makes Beijing appear more closed off and authoritarian to the international community. Only by addressing Taiwan’s presence and embracing diverse values can China truly show its strength and maturity.
Anonymous
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS