The Ministry of Health and Welfare recently convened media representatives, children’s welfare organizations and field experts, among others, to re-examine media coverage guidelines of child assault cases.
In the future, similar coverage would be allowed to report the workplace of a suspect, as long as the suspect is still working at an institution involving children, people with disabilities or the elderly, and has not yet been cleared of legal suspicion. This is based on the need to protect public welfare and prevent further harm.
However, information about the victim must not be disclosed in a manner that allows identification.
The question comes down to the definition of an “identifiable” report, a concept with no clear legal definition: How should it be determined? Had the media reported the name of the kindergarten in the recent kindergarten child assault cases, any acquaintances, neighbors, colleagues of parents or third-party individuals could have indirectly identified the victims, potentially resulting in secondary victimization.
That said, withholding the name of the kindergarten could result in more children being harmed.
The media’s disclosure of the kindergarten’s name would only permit specific individuals — such as the victims’ acquaintances and neighbors — to identify them, while the general public would not be able to do so.
Furthermore, acquaintances and neighbors disclosing the names or identifying information of child victims would contravene Article 69 of the Protection of Children and Youths Welfare and Rights Act (兒童及少年福利與權益保障法) and thus be penalized.
Weighing the pros and cons, as well as following the principle of proportionality, the Ministry of Health and Welfare should ease restrictions and allow the media to reveal the workplaces of sexual assault suspects. This would ensure the public’s right to information and help prevent further harm.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a secretary at the Pingtung Public Health Bureau.
Translated by Wang Yun-fei
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS