The pitfalls of e-payment
“We have forgotten the true virtues of money,” Jean-Pierre Landua wrote in a recent opinion article (“Will artificial intelligence put an end to money?” Aug. 1, page 8) before going on to quote Fyodor Dostoevsky: “Money is minted freedom.”
Yet on the front page (“Health, employment and education policies start today,” Aug. 1, page 1), the Taipei Times reported on planned discounts for frequent train commuters — but only if they use electronic tickets.
This might seem like a reward for frequent commuters, but it can also be seen as a form of penalty for those unable or unwilling to use electronic payment methods.
This is already evident worldwide, where visitors to cities such as London are in many cases only able to pay for public transportation using electronic cards.
For single-use journeys these can be prohibitively expensive. On top of that, private citizens’ personal movement data can inevitably be tracked by authorities.
Worse even than that is the situation in which such tickets are, for certain journeys, required to be linked to credit cards. Turn up in Singapore as one of the billions of people worldwide without a credit card and want to pay for the fare for a single metro ride from the airport into the city center? Good luck.
Electronic payment can be convenient and offers advantages, but it should be only one of multiple options in a society that purports to be free.
Cash should always be a payment option for public services, including public transportation, and its use should not be penalized.
Christopher Ruane
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS