The pitfalls of e-payment
“We have forgotten the true virtues of money,” Jean-Pierre Landua wrote in a recent opinion article (“Will artificial intelligence put an end to money?” Aug. 1, page 8) before going on to quote Fyodor Dostoevsky: “Money is minted freedom.”
Yet on the front page (“Health, employment and education policies start today,” Aug. 1, page 1), the Taipei Times reported on planned discounts for frequent train commuters — but only if they use electronic tickets.
This might seem like a reward for frequent commuters, but it can also be seen as a form of penalty for those unable or unwilling to use electronic payment methods.
This is already evident worldwide, where visitors to cities such as London are in many cases only able to pay for public transportation using electronic cards.
For single-use journeys these can be prohibitively expensive. On top of that, private citizens’ personal movement data can inevitably be tracked by authorities.
Worse even than that is the situation in which such tickets are, for certain journeys, required to be linked to credit cards. Turn up in Singapore as one of the billions of people worldwide without a credit card and want to pay for the fare for a single metro ride from the airport into the city center? Good luck.
Electronic payment can be convenient and offers advantages, but it should be only one of multiple options in a society that purports to be free.
Cash should always be a payment option for public services, including public transportation, and its use should not be penalized.
Christopher Ruane
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS