The pitfalls of e-payment
“We have forgotten the true virtues of money,” Jean-Pierre Landua wrote in a recent opinion article (“Will artificial intelligence put an end to money?” Aug. 1, page 8) before going on to quote Fyodor Dostoevsky: “Money is minted freedom.”
Yet on the front page (“Health, employment and education policies start today,” Aug. 1, page 1), the Taipei Times reported on planned discounts for frequent train commuters — but only if they use electronic tickets.
This might seem like a reward for frequent commuters, but it can also be seen as a form of penalty for those unable or unwilling to use electronic payment methods.
This is already evident worldwide, where visitors to cities such as London are in many cases only able to pay for public transportation using electronic cards.
For single-use journeys these can be prohibitively expensive. On top of that, private citizens’ personal movement data can inevitably be tracked by authorities.
Worse even than that is the situation in which such tickets are, for certain journeys, required to be linked to credit cards. Turn up in Singapore as one of the billions of people worldwide without a credit card and want to pay for the fare for a single metro ride from the airport into the city center? Good luck.
Electronic payment can be convenient and offers advantages, but it should be only one of multiple options in a society that purports to be free.
Cash should always be a payment option for public services, including public transportation, and its use should not be penalized.
Christopher Ruane
Taipei
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS