Air New Zealand Ltd’s decision to ditch its 2030 emissions target suggests more airlines would also have to confront a harsh reality: There is simply not enough sustainable fuel or new, more efficient aircraft. This double whammy has left the world’s commercial carriers, among the planet’s biggest polluters, without their two best decarbonization weapons.
Global supply of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) would be just 0.5 percent of total fuel requirements this year, the International Air Transport Association (IATA) said.
At the same time, Boeing Co and Airbus SE cannot make jets fast enough. Boeing, under pressure from regulators, has slowed output to improve quality. Airbus is so stretched it is even turning down orders. While next-generation jets can consume 15 to 20 percent less fuel, wait times to get them delivered are years long.
Illustration: Yusha
It all means airlines such as Air New Zealand have to fly older and dirtier planes for longer, while finding it almost impossible to fill them up with clean-burning fuel. The fact that SAF can be several times more expensive than conventional jet fuel does not make it any easier for carriers to hit near-term carbon targets.
Other airlines struggling to buy enough sustainable fuel might have to follow Air New Zealand’s example, said Jack Shepherd, a sustainable fuels manager at Blunomy, an energy transition consulting company.
The fallout from such decisions would extend far beyond the next decade. If more airlines scrap interim emissions goals, fuel suppliers would be even less likely to invest in SAF production, Shepherd said.
At worst, the industry’s mid-century goal of carbon neutrality also disappears from reach, he added.
“If we’re not on track in 2030, then the 2050 goal is going to be hard to achieve,” Shepherd said. “When the general public is calling for a decarbonized world, it puts pressure on these airlines and their social license to operate.”
The widespread production of SAF has been slowed by high costs, limited feedstock and patchy policy support. Much of the small volumes available are being produced in the US and Europe.
Air New Zealand had wanted to cut carbon intensity by 28.9 percent by 2030 from a 2019 baseline, and has now begun work on a new near-term target. It still aims to hit net zero by mid-century.
The Auckland-based company might be one of the first airlines to publicly abandon an interim climate goal, but rumblings about whether aviation’s targets can be hit have been getting louder.
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd this month said that the enormity of the task had become clear, following talks with about 50 potential suppliers.
“We have really witnessed how difficult it is for the SAF industry to take off,” Cathay sustainability general manager Grace Cheung said in an interview.
Even the industry’s 2050 net zero targets were unattainable, then-Qatar Airways CEO Akbar al-Baker said last year.
SAF, made from waste fats or agricultural feedstock, could cut emissions by almost 80 percent if it fully replaces jet kerosene, airlines said. They are betting their sustainable future on SAF, because other fuel sources such as hydrogen or electric batteries remain far from commercialization.
However, even with aviation’s commitment to SAF, IATA in June cut its estimates for total SAF production in 2030 after finding that many projects were behind schedule.
Output had to increase by a factor of 1,000 by 2050, said IATA, which represents more than 300 airlines worldwide.
Yet IATA said such a rate of increase sounded almost implausible.
The Science-Based Targets initiative, the world’s top arbiter of corporate climate goals, does not include many of the biggest airlines on its list of companies with verified net zero targets.
Airlines including International Airlines Group, owner of Iberia, Japan Airlines and British Airways, longer make the cut.
Meanwhile, decarbonizing air travel is becoming an even larger job.
Emissions from aviation are forecast to rise 82 percent by 2050 under BloombergNEF’s base case Economic Transition Scenario, which assumes nations and companies rely on technologies that are currently economic. That would see the industry’s share of global carbon dioxide pollution jump to from about 2.7 percent today to about 6.7 percent.
When it comes to cutting emissions, it is time for airlines to acknowledge the limits of what is possible, Emirates president Tim Clark said.
“We’ve got to have a grown-up conversation about what is achievable,” Clark said in an interview at the Farnborough Air Show this month. “We shouldn’t give up on it. We should just inject a sanity check.”
With assistance from Benedikt Kammel and Natasha White.
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
The pan-blue camp in the era after the rule of the two Chiangs — former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) — can be roughly divided into two main factions: the “true blue,” who insist on opposing communism to protect the Republic of China (ROC), and the “red-blue,” who completely reject the current government and would rather collude with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to control Taiwan. The families of the former group suffered brutally under the hands of communist thugs in China. They know the CPP well and harbor a deep hatred for it — the two
RSS