Typhoon Gaemi swept over the nation on July 24 and 25, causing severe flooding across Taiwan proper, especially in the central and southern areas. Agricultural losses caused by the typhoon were estimated to exceed NT$2.7 billion (US$82.27 million).
Gaemi injured more than 900 people and killed 10. More than 15,000 disaster-related incidents were reported to fire departments across the nation, with more than half of the cases related to fallen trees, damaged buildings and torn-off rooftops.
Although Kaohsiung has 25 detention ponds capable of retaining up to 4.98 million tonnes of stormwater, it rained so much that there was flooding in the city.
In this year’s National Scientific Report on Climate Change published by the government in May, scientists said if carbon emissions remain unchecked, rising temperatures could lead to Taiwan’s summers lasting up to seven months, adding that it could increase the intensity and frequency of droughts and cause fewer, but more intense typhoons.
The extreme-weather-related hazards — including direct heat injuries and deaths, damaged homes, and hunger caused by damaged crops and livestock — are challenging human survivability worldwide.
The Ministry of Health and Welfare data also showed that hospitals reported 1,188 cases of heat injuries last month, exceeding the 887 cases in the same month last year.
In response to the “existential threat” of extreme weather, the environment, health and welfare, and labor ministries held a Climate Change and Heat Adaptation Strategies Conference on Wednesday last week. In the conference, Minister of Environment Peng Chi-ming (彭啟明), who has a meteorology background, stressed the importance of investing in “adaptation” strategies.
Aside from allocating budgets and focusing efforts on “disease prevention” and “net zero emissions,” the government should also invest more in adaptation strategies to enhance climate resilience, Peng said.
Taiwan should not hope for “no floods,” but become “unafraid of floods” by taking appropriate action, he said.
Peng said he would propose to focus on adaptation strategies in the first National Climate Change Response Committee meeting, which is to be held by President William Lai (賴清德) on Thursday.
The two main topics of the meeting are to be the potential impacts of climate change in the world and Taiwan, and addressing the challenges ahead for the nation’s energy supply by 2035.
Climate change adaptation is not a new concept. Members of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change established a global goal on adaptation in the Paris Agreement in 2015.
However, political spats are more often discussed in Taiwan. Opposition party lawmakers’ criticism of the government’s flood control projects and local administrations after Typhoon Gaemi, and the simplified “yes or no” debate on nuclear power have been more of a focus than adaptation steps.
Hopefully, Thursday’s meeting would focus on real climate change impacts backed by scientific research and practical adaptation strategies, including the government developing plans and engaging businesses, civic organizations, local communities, households and individuals.
A rice factory in Tainan’s Houbi District (後壁) went viral online, as it on July 27 posted a video of a flood control gate it installed at the outer fence of its factory to keep floodwater out. It wrote that it also used 10 water pumps to ensure its rice stays dry.
Many Internet users praised the factory as taking “visionary” actions on its own initiative to minimize damage, and it should serve as a reminder of how the government should encourage the public to approach the issue with an aim to reduce damage and recover quickly from climate disasters.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS