A New Taipei City police officer was killed by a car while performing patrol duties in the middle of last month. As it was recognized as “death while on duty,” the compensation for his family is NT$7 million (US$213,304) less than it would have been for a “death from performing duties.”
Several Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators have expressed concern about the standard for “death while on duty.”
Given that police protect people regardless of political affiliation, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) should also take the initiative to show concern over the issue.
The biggest problem lies in the definitions of police who die while on duty and those who die from performing duties, because the distinction affects how much compensation the families receive.
For a police officer who dies on duty, compensation for the family is 180 months of salary, while for an officer who dies from performing duties, compensation is up to 240 months of salary. This is a huge difference.
Without follow-up media reports, people are likely to forget this issue quickly, but the family of the deceased officer must go on after losing their major means of financial support.
The issue of the disparity in compensation has been around for a long time. When a situation like what happened last month arises, it generates public anger, while politicians raise a hue and cry to seek greater compensation for the family to attract votes.
However, the issue is forgotten soon after the storm passes.
Due to close media attention, National Police Agency (NPA) Director-General Chang Jung-hsin (張榮興) said that the rules allow compensation of up to NT$20 million and that the agency is seeking to amend the regulations to raise the maximum so that the family of a police officer who dies while on duty would be eligible for up to NT$30 million.
The NPA said that it has submitted a draft amendment to the Ministry of the Interior and the Cabinet is reviewing it.
The media should pay attention to the situation to ensure that the NPA revises the rules to make them fairer. That would ensure that families of police officers who die while on duty can continue to live normally and their children are able to receive an education and grow up healthy.
Knight Chang is a political worker.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s