The US would provide the Philippines with US$500 million in military funding “to boost security collaboration with our oldest treaty ally in this region,” US Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced on Tuesday. “We’re building on a lot of progress the Philippines has already made to be better positioned to defend their sovereignty. That is what this is about,” Blinken told a news conference in Manila.
With concerns rising amid growing Chinese aggression toward Philippine vessels operating in the South China Sea, “Washington could be dragged into a conflict due to its mutual defense treaty with Manila,” an Agence France-Presse article said.
Such a conflict is not inevitable and the US has been trying to assist the Philippines without directly engaging the China Coast Guard, but Washington must proceed quickly to enhance the Philippines’ position and prevent China from acting with impunity.
Beijing is attempting to convey to Washington’s allies in the Asia-Pacific region that the US would not intervene in a conflict. If China gets that message across, the US’ influence in the region would be undermined and China’s position greatly bolstered.
Money alone would not be enough, as the Philippines lacks the vessels to stand up to Chinese forces. China has about 370 warships in its navy and 157 ocean-going patrol vessels in its coast guard. By contrast, the Philippine Navy has 90 combat ships and its coast guard has 62 patrol vessels. The US’ best move might be to patrol the South China Sea at random intervals alongside Philippine supply and fishing boats. The presence of the US Navy alone could deter Chinese aggression, as it would not want to provoke an armed conflict with the world’s most powerful navy.
However, the US Navy is often engaged in several missions simultaneously and could not be tied up at all times escorting Philippine vessels. For that reason, the US should lead an alliance of regional partners, which would cooperate to protect all their interests in the South China Sea.
Naturally, first island chain countries, including Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia, should be a part of that alliance. The latter two have several South China Sea claims that they are vocal about defending. The backing of an alliance to protect those claims from China might appeal to them.
Vietnam and Australia, which have also had skirmishes with China in the region, might also join such an alliance. The alliance could protect members’ access to reefs and other features that they already occupy, and could prevent Chinese occupation of the dozens of still unoccupied features in the region.
The reasons for preventing Chinese incursions are twofold: First, Chinese land-reclamation activities in the South China Sea have caused extensive environmental and ecological damage since 2014, and second, China’s militarization of the features it has occupied has resulted in heightened regional tensions and the obstruction of countries’ economic activity in their territorial or international waters.
Such threats from China would not abate, and the more China is permitted to engage in expansion and aggression with impunity, the more difficult it would become for countries in the region to protect their sovereignty.
Taiwan and the Philippines, both of which face significant challenges from Chinese aggression, should cooperate on military drills and patrols in the South China Sea, while the US and Japan should take the lead in encouraging the formation of an alliance.
Meanwhile, logistics drills that ferry supplies to Taiwan across the Bashi Channel from the Philippines and from Ishigaki Island in Japan’s Okinawa Prefecture would prepare allies for a possible Chinese blockade of Taiwan.
Military funding for Taiwan and the Philippines is great, but a strong regional alliance is the only thing that would deter Chinese expansionism and aggression.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS