If you teleported me to a foreign city for a day and gave me a choice between a trip to the supermarket or a museum, I would almost always choose the supermarket. This is not just because I like snacks more than I like still life pieces, it is because a grocery store is a museum in its own right: a little slice of local life. I am not the only person to brand “buying crisps” a cultural experience: “Grocery store tourism” is having a moment on social media. Influencers are treating trips to the supermarket with the same reverence they might reserve for the Louvre.
This is not just greed in intellectual packaging. There are dissertations to be written on why you can find prawn cocktail crisps on British supermarket shelves and nowhere else. There are deep historical reasons why Germany is so obsessed with paprika-flavored snacks.
It is not just unusual products such as lasagna-flavor crisps (available in Thailand, apparently) that give you a taste of a place — even supermarket layout can say a lot about a country. Look at eggs, for example. In the UK, they are on a shelf, in the US they are in a fridge. Why? Because of different salmonella management strategies. Americans wash their eggs, which removes a protective cuticle. So then they compensate for that by spraying the eggs with oil to stop bacteria seeping in — after which they are forced to refrigerate them. In the UK, and a lot of Europe, egg-laying hens are vaccinated against salmonella and their dirty eggs go on unrefrigerated supermarket shelves.
I wish there was a similarly logical explanation for why French supermarkets are filled with rows of utterly disgusting, unrefrigerated, ultra-high temperature processed milk, but there does not seem to be. Anyway, you would not get these same insights into international agribusiness practices from staring at the Mona Lisa now, would you?
Of course, the very best thing about supermarket tourism is how authentic it is. No annoying tourists taking selfies. Just you, some local people and a bunch of Gen Z influencers filming content for TikTok.
Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian columnist.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS