Amid last month’s heat wave, Taiwan saw a series of judicial adjudications for corruption allegations against heavyweight politicians from the three largest parties. These have highlighted the new government’s efforts to fight corruption and revealed much about the different stances of the parties toward disciplining their members for misconduct.
On July 11, former deputy premier Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was detained as part of an investigation for allegedly accepting bribes in a land rezoning project during his time as Taoyuan mayor from 2014 to 2022.
Prosecutors in Hsinchu on July 17 indicted Hsinchu County Commissioner Yang Wen-ke (楊文科) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) for allegedly receiving bribes and the misuse of public authority related to a real-estate project.
On Friday last week, Hsinchu City Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) was sentenced to seven years and four months in prison for corruption and was suspended from office. She was indicted for taking more than NT$460,030 of public funds and falsifying documents during her term as a legislator from 2020 to 2022.
On the same day, KMT Legislator Yen Kuan-heng (顏寬恒) was convicted of corruption for embezzling money and forgery related to transactions involving his family mansion. The Taichung District Court gave him a combined sentence of more than eight years.
As this was the first ruling, he has yet to lose his office. The Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法) only requires a lawmaker to be dismissed after the third ruling.
These indictments and rulings have demonstrated the judicial and prosecutor organs’ proactiveness in fighting corruption, regardless of political party. They also demonstrate judicial independence in line with the expectations of Taiwanese.
A recent survey showed a rise in public trust and satisfaction with President William Lai (賴清德). However, the public has been less impressed with the reactions of the opposition parties to the corruption cases.
Despite Cheng saying he is innocent, the DPP suspended his party membership for three years, and said he would be expelled if found guilty.
For the KMT, despite its disciplinary regulations saying members would be suspended if they are detained for a probe, and expelled if they are convicted even in a first trial, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) and the party disciplinary committee said that no punishment would be meted out until the convictions of Yang and Yen were affirmed in a third trial.
The KMT has shown a looser tolerance of alleged corruption, and is applying different standards from previous disciplinary actions. Former Keelung mayor Hsu Tsai-li (許財利) was expelled in 2006 after a first-trial sentence and former Executive Yuan secretary-general Lin Yi-shih (林益世) was expelled following his detention for a corruption investigation in 2012. Two KMT legislators were also suspended soon after being detained for investigation in 2020.
As for TPP, ignoring that Kao misused public funds and forged documents, TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) said she embezzled “only NT$116,514” and complained about alleged biases in the justice system and political interference. The party even said that Kao should not have been suspended from her mayoral duties, challenging the Local Government Act (地方制度法) that has lawfully suspended local administrators sentenced for corruption for years.
While the opposition-dominated legislature is seeking the controversial expansion of powers for judicial investigations and convictions, the reluctance of the KMT and TPP to discipline members and their attempts to shield their misconduct by bringing judicial judgements into disrepute is a worrying sign for the country’s judicial system, as well as a setback for democracy.
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with
RSS