US President Joe Biden signed the Promoting a Resolution to the Tibet-China Dispute Act, also known as the Resolve Tibet Act, into law on July 12.
However, he made sure to note in his signed statement that the US recognizes Tibet (as referenced in the act) as part of the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
Tibetans throughout the world welcomed the act and celebrated it. On Thursday last week, Penpa Tsering, sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration, also known as the Tibetan government in exile, attended a reception in Washington to thank members of the US Congress for making the act law.
The act includes major modifications to the US’ Tibetan Policy Act of 2002, all of which strengthens Tibet’s hand and position against the PRC, which was only established in 1949.
With the passage of the law, the US government officially recognizes that Tibet is not only comprised of the so-called Tibetan Autonomous Region, which was only established in 1965 by the PRC, but now includes areas that Beijing designated as part of the Tibetan Autonomous Region in 2018. This more or less states what Tibetans have been saying when it comes to Tibet territorially, which is that Tibet is a country that includes the three provinces of Amdo, Kham and U-Tsang.
They view the claims made by the PRC that Tibet has been part of China since ancient times as historically inaccurate, with the people of Tibet having the right to self-determination as they have a distinct culture and identity.
The law says that the Tibet-China dispute is unresolved and promotes substantive dialogue between the PRC, the Dalai Lama and their representative, which would also include the democratically elected leaders of the Tibetan community, which in many ways recognizes the Tibetan government in exile based in Dharamshala, India.
The law also requires the US government to combat the propagation of disinformation by the PRC about Tibet, its history, its people, its institutions and the Dalai Lama, and says that the designated US special coordinator to Tibet must work with US Department of State bureaus to implement this.
The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs denounced the US for its backing of Tibet even before the Resolve Tibet Act was signed into law.
Specifically, during the mid-June visit of US representatives Michael McCaul and Nancy Pelosi to India, the US congressional delegation met with Tibetan and Indian leaders at Dharamshala, including His Holiness the Dalai Lama and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. India displayed and demonstrated its critical role in resolving the Tibet-China dispute.
In all of its criticisms of this law, Beijing maintains that Tibet is a domestic matter. In actuality, the Tibet-China conflict is a global problem with implications for the world’s sanctity, as well as the entirety of Asia. It remains Asia’s water tower and is the third pole.
The US law on Tibet comes at a time when there are growing ties between the Tibetans and Taiwan. Major developments appear to be visible on the horizon when it comes to the Tibet-China conflict. With this chess piece being moved forward, it is now up to Beijing to respond.
Tenzing Dhamdul is a research associate at the New Delhi-based Foundation for Non-Violent Alternatives.
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
In competitive sports, the narrative surrounding transgender athletes is often clouded by misconceptions and prejudices. Critics sometimes accuse transgender athletes of “gaming the system” to gain an unfair advantage, perpetuating the stereotype that their participation undermines the integrity of competition. However, this perspective not only ignores the rigorous efforts transgender athletes invest to meet eligibility standards, but also devalues their personal and athletic achievements. Understanding the gap between these stereotypes and the reality of individual efforts requires a deeper examination of societal bias and the challenges transgender athletes face. One of the most pervasive arguments against the inclusion of transgender athletes
When viewing Taiwan’s political chaos, I often think of several lines from Incantation, a poem by the winner of the 1980 Nobel Prize in Literature, Czeslaw Milosz: “Beautiful and very young are Philo-Sophia, and poetry, her ally in the service of the good... Their friendship will be glorious, their time has no limit, their enemies have delivered themselves to destruction.” Milosz wrote Incantation when he was a professor of Slavic Studies at the University of California, Berkeley. He firmly believed that Poland would rise again under a restored democracy and liberal order. As one of several self-exiled or expelled poets from
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
RSS