Typhoon Gaemi brought torrents of rain, and with it, the parapet on a building in Hualien City came crashing down onto a parked car and killed a 45-year-old woman who was a passenger inside it. Her seven-year-old daughter was taken to hospital and is still in intensive care.
Article 77 of the Building Act (建築法) states that the owners and users of buildings are responsible for the upkeep of structural safety of properties. However, the walls of many older buildings across the country have structural issues and cannot be repaired easily.
Apart from requiring a professional assessment to determine whether outer walls need renovating or improvements — most people do not have the knowledge or expertise to make that determination, even when disregarding the regulations — repairing a single wall could easily cost more than NT$100,000. Even including local subsidies, many residents are simply unable to afford or bear responsibility of such a burden.
All these factors add up to create the expanding problem of structural deterioration.
If structural safety is to be maintained, residents of high-rise communities first ought to ensure that their walls and structural elements are regularly inspected and fixed, and that they have some knowledge of renovations. They should not procrastinate.
Beyond that, there is a need for official, objective third-party organizations to help with assessments. They could create a budget for maintenance and actuarial allocation methods for subsidies. With all of that, repairs could become systematized.
The buildings sorely in need of repairs are usually older structures. Most residents are retirees or those who lack financial means. Some residents are so destitute that they only have the four walls around them and little else. There is little chance that residents with limited financial resources can afford to maintain their buildings.
In Japan’s case, it has long had a repair reserve fund (shuzen tsumitatekin) in place to manage structural renovation assessments and repairs. A fee is collected each month for the reserve fund by the building community’s management association and the money must be used to carry out repairs every 15 years.
With this honed, localized system, Japan’s central government does not even have to get involved. Taiwan could benefit from adopting a similar approach.
For suspects in tort cases involving falling objects and injury, structural assessments and repairs should be mandatory. If repairs are put off, it might be too late to prevent injury for someone unlucky enough to be passing by. Towering apartment buildings and high-rise apartment communities could learn to become more self-sufficient and take responsibility for maintaining structural safety.
If everyone makes changes, communities would face far fewer instances involving concrete or debris crashing down on someone. In being more proactive, frequent “disasters raining down from the sky” can be avoided.
Dino Wei is an engineer.
Translated by Tim Smith
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS