Typhoon Gaemi brought torrents of rain, and with it, the parapet on a building in Hualien City came crashing down onto a parked car and killed a 45-year-old woman who was a passenger inside it. Her seven-year-old daughter was taken to hospital and is still in intensive care.
Article 77 of the Building Act (建築法) states that the owners and users of buildings are responsible for the upkeep of structural safety of properties. However, the walls of many older buildings across the country have structural issues and cannot be repaired easily.
Apart from requiring a professional assessment to determine whether outer walls need renovating or improvements — most people do not have the knowledge or expertise to make that determination, even when disregarding the regulations — repairing a single wall could easily cost more than NT$100,000. Even including local subsidies, many residents are simply unable to afford or bear responsibility of such a burden.
All these factors add up to create the expanding problem of structural deterioration.
If structural safety is to be maintained, residents of high-rise communities first ought to ensure that their walls and structural elements are regularly inspected and fixed, and that they have some knowledge of renovations. They should not procrastinate.
Beyond that, there is a need for official, objective third-party organizations to help with assessments. They could create a budget for maintenance and actuarial allocation methods for subsidies. With all of that, repairs could become systematized.
The buildings sorely in need of repairs are usually older structures. Most residents are retirees or those who lack financial means. Some residents are so destitute that they only have the four walls around them and little else. There is little chance that residents with limited financial resources can afford to maintain their buildings.
In Japan’s case, it has long had a repair reserve fund (shuzen tsumitatekin) in place to manage structural renovation assessments and repairs. A fee is collected each month for the reserve fund by the building community’s management association and the money must be used to carry out repairs every 15 years.
With this honed, localized system, Japan’s central government does not even have to get involved. Taiwan could benefit from adopting a similar approach.
For suspects in tort cases involving falling objects and injury, structural assessments and repairs should be mandatory. If repairs are put off, it might be too late to prevent injury for someone unlucky enough to be passing by. Towering apartment buildings and high-rise apartment communities could learn to become more self-sufficient and take responsibility for maintaining structural safety.
If everyone makes changes, communities would face far fewer instances involving concrete or debris crashing down on someone. In being more proactive, frequent “disasters raining down from the sky” can be avoided.
Dino Wei is an engineer.
Translated by Tim Smith
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS