The Constitutional Court’s temporary injunction said that 12 sections of the recently passed legislature reform laws, backed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), were urgent threats to governance.
Following the court’s decision, the KMT caucus said that “judicial independence has died.” Many TPP supporters also echoed similar sentiments.
Yet, for many who have followed the situation closely, the court’s decision should not have been surprising considering the drastic expansion of the Legislature Yuan’s powers charted out by the reforms, which undermine the balance of power between the branches of government.
There has also been significant public pushback against the reforms, culminating in the “Bluebird movement,” with demonstrations across Taiwan.
Largely failing to address the constitutionality of the reforms, the KMT and the TPP have chosen the low road, ie, when in doubt, blame the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
A conspiracy that the Constitutional Court is working on behalf of the DPP is a quick way to refute any concern by appealing to populist sentiments. Using such baseless theories can lead to a descent into populist madness, eroding common ground in civic debates. Unfortunately, even TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is irresponsibly spreading such views. Conspiracies increasingly define the TPP’s raison d’etre, painting a grim picture for the young party’s future. The spread of disinformation really only benefits China’s efforts to undermine Taiwan’s democracy.
Moreover, the TPP is not only willing to brazenly use disinformation for short-term political gain, but also has a robust network of online influencers, some of whom are legislators, to quickly promote its message.
One such influencer is TPP legislative caucus convener Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌). Huang is a sophist who often undermines the legitimacy of court orders. After failing to defend Article 25, which prohibits officials from “reverse questioning,” in the courts, Huang challenged the Constitutional Court Justice to a one-on-one debate — an absurd act of defiance and desperation.
Under the TPP’s logic, influencers will rule the Earth. And when they eventually do, we might no longer have any semblance of a responsible government, but we will get endless political entertainment in return: hours upon hours of political entertainment, ESPN-esque highlights and snarky political slogans on T-shirts — a fair trade for TPP supporters.
Moreover, following Ann Kao’s (高虹安) sentencing for corruption, the TPP continues to mount a vapid defense of the once-promising political star. Shifting the blame and the goalposts are tactics that the TPP uses when rulings are not in its favor.
Prosecutors said that Kao, who was suspended as Hsinchu mayor over the sentence, instructed her assistants when she was a legislator to overstate their overtime and give the extra cash to her. Kao used her position to exploit her employees. She was sentenced to seven years and four months in prison.
Yet, the TPP blames her former assistant Huang Hui-wen (黃惠玟) instead of apologizing for Kao’s actions. There is little empathy from the TPP for those who she exploited. This is a case of victim blaming and underscores how little the TPP cares for workers.
The TPP should be honest to the public and own up to its mistakes.
Spare the public of the self-aggrandizing “heroics” of Huang Kuo-chang, the self-victimization of Kao, and the disinformation narratives of Ko.
Linus Chiou is a graduate student at National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University.
On Thursday last week, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen was re-elected in Strasbourg, France. Before her re-election she gave a speech to the European Parliament and published a document entitled “Europe’s Choice: Political Guidelines for the Next European Commission 2024-2029.” Her statement attracted headlines in Taipei and Beijing. In Taiwan, it was welcomed, whereas the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the commission president was “playing with fire.” The part of her statement that sparked such different reactions was of course about Taiwan. Von der Leyen focused on the Indo-Pacific region in a way that previous European Commissions have not. She
When it comes to national security and foreign affairs, President William Lai (賴清德) has said he wants to maintain the same policies as his predecessor, Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). Unfortunately, he does not find himself in the same geopolitical circumstances as Tsai during her presidency. The loss of a legislative majority aside, the regional geopolitical situation is in a continuous state of flux. Regardless of the perception of the binary nature of the forces that conspire against or with Taiwan — the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the US — the actual situation is far more complex, as encapsulated by many
While new immigrants and their children born in Taiwan have grown to a population of more than 1 million, the legislature in a late-night session on Tuesday last week passed a basic act governing “new residents” to facilitate their integration into Taiwanese society. In addition to setting up a new special commission under the Executive Yuan to oversee new resident affairs and services, the act mandates that the government aid them with counseling, medical and maternity healthcare, employment rights protection, education, and cultural empowerment. It aims to protect their rights, help them obtain residency and integrate into a multicultural society in
Taiwan has been the focus of international media after former US president Donald Trump said the nation should pay the US for defense. Former Trump administration officials such as Elbridge Colby and Robert O’Brien believe Taiwan should boost defense spending to demonstrate its willingness to resist China. However, a narrow focus on spending distracts from more urgent issues the nation needs to address, which is making civil society more resilient in the face of external hostilities. President William Lai (賴清德) last month announced the establishment of the Whole-of-Society Defense Resilience Committee to boost civil society’s resilience, including building up food