The Constitutional Court’s temporary injunction said that 12 sections of the recently passed legislature reform laws, backed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), were urgent threats to governance.
Following the court’s decision, the KMT caucus said that “judicial independence has died.” Many TPP supporters also echoed similar sentiments.
Yet, for many who have followed the situation closely, the court’s decision should not have been surprising considering the drastic expansion of the Legislature Yuan’s powers charted out by the reforms, which undermine the balance of power between the branches of government.
There has also been significant public pushback against the reforms, culminating in the “Bluebird movement,” with demonstrations across Taiwan.
Largely failing to address the constitutionality of the reforms, the KMT and the TPP have chosen the low road, ie, when in doubt, blame the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
A conspiracy that the Constitutional Court is working on behalf of the DPP is a quick way to refute any concern by appealing to populist sentiments. Using such baseless theories can lead to a descent into populist madness, eroding common ground in civic debates. Unfortunately, even TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is irresponsibly spreading such views. Conspiracies increasingly define the TPP’s raison d’etre, painting a grim picture for the young party’s future. The spread of disinformation really only benefits China’s efforts to undermine Taiwan’s democracy.
Moreover, the TPP is not only willing to brazenly use disinformation for short-term political gain, but also has a robust network of online influencers, some of whom are legislators, to quickly promote its message.
One such influencer is TPP legislative caucus convener Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌). Huang is a sophist who often undermines the legitimacy of court orders. After failing to defend Article 25, which prohibits officials from “reverse questioning,” in the courts, Huang challenged the Constitutional Court Justice to a one-on-one debate — an absurd act of defiance and desperation.
Under the TPP’s logic, influencers will rule the Earth. And when they eventually do, we might no longer have any semblance of a responsible government, but we will get endless political entertainment in return: hours upon hours of political entertainment, ESPN-esque highlights and snarky political slogans on T-shirts — a fair trade for TPP supporters.
Moreover, following Ann Kao’s (高虹安) sentencing for corruption, the TPP continues to mount a vapid defense of the once-promising political star. Shifting the blame and the goalposts are tactics that the TPP uses when rulings are not in its favor.
Prosecutors said that Kao, who was suspended as Hsinchu mayor over the sentence, instructed her assistants when she was a legislator to overstate their overtime and give the extra cash to her. Kao used her position to exploit her employees. She was sentenced to seven years and four months in prison.
Yet, the TPP blames her former assistant Huang Hui-wen (黃惠玟) instead of apologizing for Kao’s actions. There is little empathy from the TPP for those who she exploited. This is a case of victim blaming and underscores how little the TPP cares for workers.
The TPP should be honest to the public and own up to its mistakes.
Spare the public of the self-aggrandizing “heroics” of Huang Kuo-chang, the self-victimization of Kao, and the disinformation narratives of Ko.
Linus Chiou is a graduate student at National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for