The annual Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore facilitates interactions between the region’s leaders in an attempt to strengthen regional security in Asia. At this year’s Shangri-La Dialogue, there are conflicts between countries regarding maritime boundaries and nuclear weapons. In particular, Taiwan and the South China Sea conflict between China and the Philippines were hotly debated at this year’s event.
While the Shangri-La Dialogue is convened to boost regional security and sustainability, the focus on security should not only be for the benefit of major countries such as superpowers, but also for all states in Asia. People in these countries deserve an equal chance to live in peace. Even though people have different opinions, they should listen to each other so that they could gain a deeper understanding and have a good relationship with others. To maintain regional security, all countries should pay attention to cooperation over competition.
Instead of maximizing the benefits for their own countries, national leaders should balance the interests of their own countries and those of others. Harmony can be established by focusing on similarities rather than differences. When people share similar beliefs, interests and values, they can better connect with each other.
Building good relationships between countries is the main way to maintain harmony and regional security.
As living in harmony is an Asian value, it contributes positively to relationships between Asian countries. If all countries sing the same tune, they can easily reach a fair agreement.
Phathara-on Wesarat is head of the bachelor of business administration program in the department of Humanities and Social Sciences at Prince of Songkla University in Thailand.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS