A global outage affecting computers running Windows operating systems earlier this month took airlines around the world by surprise, leading to air traffic chaos, while other transportation systems, financial companies, and hospitals and clinics, as well as government departments worldwide were also affected.
In Taiwan, not even the nation’s largest hospital system — National Taiwan University Hospital — was spared.
As the saying goes: “Never let a good crisis go to waste.” With this incident over, what lessons can be learned?
First, critical infrastructure is by no means limited to hardware. With ever-increasing digitization and automation of equipment and infrastructure, software is playing a far more important role. Peacetime has made people more complacent and less aware of these changes.
When departments in governments and private entities are busy compiling management inventories for their critical infrastructure, they cannot let such foundational software as operations systems slip through the cracks. At the same time, software crashes absolutely must be included in emergency response training to address problematic software, hardware or computer system breakdowns.
Second, no matter how technologically advanced or how great the level of digitization and automation is, governments and private enterprises must keep backups to be able to maintain the basic functional equipment society needs. Governments and companies need to integrate resilience into their mindset.
Last, Taiwan’s long-term development has tended to favor hardware production, but has somewhat neglected the software side of computers. As a result, the nation has put too high a degree of trust and reliance on Microsoft products and those of other major international manufacturers. Should another system outage occur, all the nation would be able to do is wait for the original manufacturer to implement a solution or fix. The nation cannot have a repeat of this problem when using generative artificial intelligence.
Huang Wei-ping works in public service and has a master’s degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University in the US.
Translated by Tim Smith
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS