A preschool teacher in Taipei’s Xinyi District (信義) was indicted in August last year on charges of alleged sexual assault and offenses of forced obscenity against six girls. Prosecutors said the man was suspected of sexually abusing at least 20 girls.
There has been public anger toward not only the perpetrator, but also some government agencies that were accused of not being proactive enough.
The teacher, Mao Chun-shen (毛畯珅), is the son of the owner of Taipei Piramide School (私立培諾米達信義幼兒園), and prosecutors said they found that he possessed more than 600 sexually explicit images or videos of children he allegedly abused.
Parents reported the first suspected case to the authorities in July 2022. However, after watching the preschool’s surveillance footage, prosecutors found no clear signs of any wrongdoing, and Mao was not suspended from his teaching job, while the preschool was allowed to enroll more students. Prosecutors did not charge him due to a lack of evidence.
After more parents accused him of sexual abuse, prosecutors indicted and detained Mao in July last year — a year after the first case was reported.
There has been a public outcry, because the Taipei City Government seemed to have quickly dismissed the case in 2022, while prosecutors were still investigating it, allowing Mao to continue teaching.
Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安), who took office in December 2022, bowed and apologized on July 19 to those affected by the case, accepted responsibility and promised that the city government would improve its policies.
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), Chiang’s predecessor as Taipei mayor, on the same day said there is room for improvement, and during investigations officials should be “protecting children,” while not “causing parents panic and deciding a suspect is guilty before any ruling.”
He also said that “apologizing is the easiest, but what is the use if you cannot solve the problem?” He was seemingly shifting the blame to Chiang.
However, Chinese-language Mirror Magazine on Tuesday last week revealed the city government’s meeting minutes from July and August 2022, when Ko was mayor. They showed that the education and social welfare departments were aware of the complaints, but passed the buck to each other and failed to follow up, with a document marked: “Noted and filed for reference.”
The city government on Friday last week announced 10 steps to improve policies and said the two departments would face a performance review committee.
It might be a relief to some parents that the preschool was shut down. The Taipei District Court is expected to reach a verdict in the case next month, and the city government has admitted its negligence and promised to revise its policies to prevent similar cases, including requiring the immediate suspension of suspects from teaching once a sexual assault report is made.
However, while seeking justice and holding officials accountable are important, the harm caused to victims and their family is irreparable. The victims should be carefully supported.
Laws must also be reviewed to better define which government agencies are responsible for handling such cases.
Moreover, the case is also a reminder for parents and schools to reconsider when they should start teaching children about the difference between appropriate and inappropriate touching to prevent sexual abuse. Parents and schools should trust children when they report uncomfortable experiences, while education and social welfare officials should receive periodic training so that they can handle such cases better.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion