India is not the world’s healthiest country. Sadly, regulators seem determined to make the problem worse with each passing year.
Urban Indians, especially wealthier ones, have a relatively sedentary lifestyle and their diet is heavy in carbohydrates and fats. This might not show up easily in the numbers, given the size of the country’s population.
About 23 percent of Indians were technically overweight, which is defined as a body mass index (BMI) over 25, an analysis by The Lancet recently found. Many parts of the world, such as West Asia and Eastern Europe, do much worse.
However, when you break the data down, worrying trends emerge. Women over 30, for instance, have startlingly high rates of abdominal obesity in India — with a prevalence of more than 55 percent for women older than 40. That is a more dangerous indicator of predisposition to metabolic disease than regular BMI.
Moreover, genetics seem to make Indians particularly vulnerable to such ailments.
One scientist at generic pharmaceutical company Lupin Ltd said that Indians tend to have greater insulin resistance and develop type II diabetes at a younger age than the average.
The Lancet suggests that more than 100 million Indians have diabetes and 136 million are pre-diabetic. That is a crisis — one that is set to grow worse as India becomes richer and more urban.
The problem is usually blamed on a change in the diets of middle-class Indians, from fresh to processed foods. The assumption is that packaged products are unhealthier. It is right there in the name: “junk food.”
I am a tiny bit skeptical. I am addicted to Delhi’s deep-fried street food, and I am not so sure it is better for me than anything I could buy in a supermarket.
At the same time, there is data suggesting junk food in India is worse than in many other countries, with higher levels of salt, sugar and saturated fats. More importantly, packaged food can be regulated, so people at least know what they are eating. Ideally, that would allow consumers to better manage their intake of fat and salt.
There remains a lot of room for this transition in India.
Branded food makes up only one-third of the Indian market, but would expand at a compound annual growth rate above 12 percent in coming years, Nestle India Ltd said.
The question is whether regulators are up to the task. They recently announced that nutritional information about sugar, salt and saturated fat would henceforth be displayed “in bold letters and relatively increased font size on labels of packaged food items.” The news was generally welcomed.
In fact, it represented a significant climbdown. The new rules specify that this information would be estimated based on (arbitrary) serving sizes, and as a percentage of recommended daily intake. Translating this into “good” or “bad” requires a level of mental math that the average shopper likely would not want to endure.
The regulations replace a draft plan that would have imposed fewer requirements on shoppers, but was still flawed. In 2022, officials proposed a “star” rating, similar to the ones used to indicate if an appliance is energy-efficient.
As scientists said, that merely “helps the consumer choose the least unhealthy option among a host of unhealthy options.”
Critics worry that India’s food regulators respond more readily to big food companies than to doctors.
The last time they backtracked on warning labels, they placated angry consumers by telling them a new adviser would study the issue — a man whom the New York Times described as leading an institution “almost entirely funded by the Goliaths of the agribusiness, food and pharmaceutical industries.”
The processed food industry is shooting itself in the foot. If companies want Indians to make the switch from mouth-watering street food, they ought to welcome greater transparency, so consumers can be certain they are choosing healthier alternatives.
Better models are available even in India’s neighborhood. In Sri Lanka, for example, sodas are labeled with a “traffic light” system that goes from green (healthy) to red (godawful levels of sugar). Recent research has shown that the system consistently steers consumers towards healthier choices.
Indians need simple, easy-to-understand and prominent warning labels, so that their better natures are given a chance to overtake their impulses. Otherwise, their richer country would only be an unhealthier one.
Mihir Sharma is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. A senior fellow at the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi, he is author of Restart: The Last Chance for the Indian Economy.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s