Cursing, biting, blocking, kicking and grabbing... What has the Legislative Yuan become?
After the communist states in Eastern Europe collapsed at the end of the 20th century, they have walked toward liberalization. However, perhaps the difference between them and Taiwan lies in the incompleteness of the latter’s transitional justice, as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) with a party-state ideology from the old political system remain, and their national identity is entangled with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) due to their pro-China sympathies.
The KMT and TPP seem to be intent on creating chaos.
The Legislative Yuan and Executive Yuan are different national governing bodies, and along with the Judicial Yuan, the Examination Yuan and the Control Yuan, they form a “separation of powers.”
The five-power system was originally established by Republic of China (ROC) founder Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙), and is a tailor-made system for the ROC.
However, the KMT does not value the opportunity for normal democratic development after Taiwan’s democratization and is now abusing the party’s slim legislative majority.
The TPP is also failing to live up to public expectations as a young upstart party and echoes the KMT, which has been haunted by the party-state ideology and has failed to reform itself.
The TPP’s role is helping the wicked do wicked deeds.
If we look at the forms and rituals of Taiwan’s political system, the Executive Yuan and Legislative Yuan are counterparts: The Executive Yuan proposes policy and budget plans to the Legislative Yuan, while the Legislative Yuan questions the Executive Yuan’s officials and reviews the budgets, thus forming a “ritual relationship” in politics. As a result, the executive and legislative branches have their own powers and functions.
The Constitution of Taiwan adopts a “presidential system,” and our president is similar to a head of state with the status of a monarch, but the president is elected by the people to a term of office.
While the country is governed by the premier and members of the Cabinet, the president has the power to appoint the premier and is in charge of national defense and foreign affairs.
Regarding national governance, the Legislative Yuan’s counterpart is the Executive Yuan, in accordance with the constitution of the ROC since its establishment in China. After undergoing several constitutional amendments in Taiwan, the Constitution has become the current form.
The Constitution is made up of terms and conditions, while the executive and legislative branches, empowered by the Constitution, are the governing bodies in reality.
During the KMT government’s rule after it came to Taiwan in the mid-20th century, it adopted the Temporary Provisions for the Period of National Mobilization in Suppression of Communist Rebellion (動員勘亂時期臨時條款) and froze some of the people’s rights to enforce a dictatorial and authoritarian rule.
During the Martial Law period from 1949 to 1987, which lasted for 38 years, there were more “politicos” (政棍) than “politicians” (政客), and only a few “statesmen” (政治家) in Taiwan.
Today, some KMT legislators are still ignorant and incompetent, and several lawmakers are even local heavyweights with criminal backgrounds trying to “bleach” themselves through elections. These “new thieves” have been acting more recklessly than the “old thieves” of the past.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s