Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s decision not to back Ursula von der Leyen as European Commission president was driven by fear of losing right-wing grassroots supporters, but might curb her influence over EU choices, analysts said.
The European Parliament elected Von der Leyen for a second five-year term on Thursday last week to lead the bloc’s executive with support from center-right, center-left, liberal and green groups. She received 401 votes, with 284 against in a secret ballot in the 720-member chamber.
Meloni’s Brothers of Italy, part of the European Conservatives and Reformists group, revealed its decision after the vote when it said von der Leyen had shifted too far left, particularly on green pledges.
Even though von der Leyen did not need Meloni’s 24 lawmakers to win, the vote marked a shift from the prime minister’s past efforts to keep good relations with the Commission as Rome grapples with mammoth public debt.
“Meloni cares a lot about being consistent. She had said she would never vote with the left. When it became clear that her votes were not needed, she stuck to that pledge,” said Giovanni Orsina, a politics professor at Rome’s Luiss University.
However, the move dismayed many Italian commentators who said the Commission might now be less indulgent toward Italy’s public finances and its faltering attempts to spend billions of euros of EU post-COVID-19 recovery funds.
That remains to be seen, but Meloni’s first concern appeared to be fending off internal competition at home from her hard-right coalition ally, Matteo Salvini’s League party.
“She is afraid of exposing herself on the right, and this fear overwhelmed everything else,” said Francesco Galietti, head of Policy Sonar, a political risk consultancy in Rome.
Brothers of Italy is now polling at nearly 30 percent — its highest ever — while the League is about 8 percent, but Galietti pointed to volatility in Italian politics and said Meloni could not afford to alienate traditional voters.
Before moderating her positions after coming to power in 2022, Meloni was considered further to the right than Salvini, and used to advocate for Italy to leave the eurozone.
The Commission declined to comment for this story.
Asked by reporters on Thursday whether she regretted seeking Meloni’s support, Von der Leyen said only that the vote showed she had taken the right approach in assembling backers who are “pro-European, pro-Ukraine and pro-rule of law.”
Carlo Calenda, leader of centrist party Action, said in a radio interview on Friday that Meloni had preferred to be “a faction leader rather than a prime minister,” and it was “dangerous” for Italy to be in opposition in Europe.
Meloni triumphed in Italy’s European Parliament elections last month, in contrast to setbacks for French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, but since then things have not gone her way.
After being left out of a deal on the bloc’s top jobs she protested that Von der Leyen and other leaders were flouting voters’ wishes by ignoring a surge in right-wing support.
She refused to back Von der Leyen along with groups including the Patriots for Europe, a far-right alliance which includes Marine Le Pen’s French National Rally and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s Fidesz.
Some analysts have said that Meloni did not want to side with the EU’s mainstream forces ahead of a possible former US president Donald Trump victory at US elections in November that could boost the bloc’s nationalists.
Yet Wolfango Piccoli, an analyst at London-based political risk consultancy Teneo, said such a strategy could backfire as Trump would likely embrace an isolationist foreign policy which would oblige Italy to strengthen European bonds.
“A plan like that would not be useful to the Italian national interest,” Piccoli added.
In an interview with Italian daily Corriere della Sera published on Saturday, Meloni said she would still be able to work with Von der Leyen and that it would be “surreal” to imagine Brussels would punish Italy when it came to deciding on Commission roles. Rome’s candidate is European Affairs Minister Raffaele Fitto.
However, her relationship with Brussels looks trickier now and Piccoli said it might be harder to have a say on issues including defense and migration, although budget procedures based on pre-established steps are less likely to be affected.
“The real question is to count in Europe,” he said.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS