Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s decision not to back Ursula von der Leyen as European Commission president was driven by fear of losing right-wing grassroots supporters, but might curb her influence over EU choices, analysts said.
The European Parliament elected Von der Leyen for a second five-year term on Thursday last week to lead the bloc’s executive with support from center-right, center-left, liberal and green groups. She received 401 votes, with 284 against in a secret ballot in the 720-member chamber.
Meloni’s Brothers of Italy, part of the European Conservatives and Reformists group, revealed its decision after the vote when it said von der Leyen had shifted too far left, particularly on green pledges.
Even though von der Leyen did not need Meloni’s 24 lawmakers to win, the vote marked a shift from the prime minister’s past efforts to keep good relations with the Commission as Rome grapples with mammoth public debt.
“Meloni cares a lot about being consistent. She had said she would never vote with the left. When it became clear that her votes were not needed, she stuck to that pledge,” said Giovanni Orsina, a politics professor at Rome’s Luiss University.
However, the move dismayed many Italian commentators who said the Commission might now be less indulgent toward Italy’s public finances and its faltering attempts to spend billions of euros of EU post-COVID-19 recovery funds.
That remains to be seen, but Meloni’s first concern appeared to be fending off internal competition at home from her hard-right coalition ally, Matteo Salvini’s League party.
“She is afraid of exposing herself on the right, and this fear overwhelmed everything else,” said Francesco Galietti, head of Policy Sonar, a political risk consultancy in Rome.
Brothers of Italy is now polling at nearly 30 percent — its highest ever — while the League is about 8 percent, but Galietti pointed to volatility in Italian politics and said Meloni could not afford to alienate traditional voters.
Before moderating her positions after coming to power in 2022, Meloni was considered further to the right than Salvini, and used to advocate for Italy to leave the eurozone.
The Commission declined to comment for this story.
Asked by reporters on Thursday whether she regretted seeking Meloni’s support, Von der Leyen said only that the vote showed she had taken the right approach in assembling backers who are “pro-European, pro-Ukraine and pro-rule of law.”
Carlo Calenda, leader of centrist party Action, said in a radio interview on Friday that Meloni had preferred to be “a faction leader rather than a prime minister,” and it was “dangerous” for Italy to be in opposition in Europe.
Meloni triumphed in Italy’s European Parliament elections last month, in contrast to setbacks for French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, but since then things have not gone her way.
After being left out of a deal on the bloc’s top jobs she protested that Von der Leyen and other leaders were flouting voters’ wishes by ignoring a surge in right-wing support.
She refused to back Von der Leyen along with groups including the Patriots for Europe, a far-right alliance which includes Marine Le Pen’s French National Rally and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s Fidesz.
Some analysts have said that Meloni did not want to side with the EU’s mainstream forces ahead of a possible former US president Donald Trump victory at US elections in November that could boost the bloc’s nationalists.
Yet Wolfango Piccoli, an analyst at London-based political risk consultancy Teneo, said such a strategy could backfire as Trump would likely embrace an isolationist foreign policy which would oblige Italy to strengthen European bonds.
“A plan like that would not be useful to the Italian national interest,” Piccoli added.
In an interview with Italian daily Corriere della Sera published on Saturday, Meloni said she would still be able to work with Von der Leyen and that it would be “surreal” to imagine Brussels would punish Italy when it came to deciding on Commission roles. Rome’s candidate is European Affairs Minister Raffaele Fitto.
However, her relationship with Brussels looks trickier now and Piccoli said it might be harder to have a say on issues including defense and migration, although budget procedures based on pre-established steps are less likely to be affected.
“The real question is to count in Europe,” he said.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS