Former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) decided not to attend the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) national convention, but some people are spreading rumors that Tsai is unhappy with the party or claiming that her faction within the DPP is somehow dissatisfied. However, such hearsay lacks the elevated maturity, let alone spirit of freedom, found in a democracy. Truth be told, her not attending is a hallmark of a mature democracy.
Just like the presidents of the US and other mature democracies, the moment retiring presidents leave office, they cease to stand in the limelight and tend to keep their opinions on political issues to themselves. It is only when a sitting president needs help that a former president might be invited to step forward and provide advice. This is a custom that our country ought to establish following our transition to democracy, and Tsai has established an effective model worth following.
The Presidents Club: Inside the World’s Most Exclusive Fraternity, coauthored by Harvard Kennedy School of Economics chair Nancy Gibbs and Time magazine vice editor-in-chief Michael Duffy, is a series of expert discussions on the lives of US presidents after leaving office. In the book, Gibbs and Duffy talk about the personal relationship between political rivals and former US presidents Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush. After Bush finished his term in the Oval Office, he became an important unofficial consultant for Clinton. This is an important function for retired presidents — serving as low-key, knowledgeable and experienced advisers, rather than jostling for power behind the scenes.
Democratic countries only need one chief executive. This not only stabilizes a country, but also allows its sitting president to coolly carry out governance without meddling from former presidents.
That being said, after Taiwan’s first democratic election in 1996, there have been numerous instances of outgoing or pastured presidents interfering in government policy, trying to steal the spotlight from political parties or giving their two cents on internal party matters. After former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) left office, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) quickly banished him from the party over a reform schism. Due to the litigation issues of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), it was difficult for him to ever effectively wield any more power within the DPP after he left office.
By contrast, after leaving office, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the KMT on multiple occasions led the charge or chimed in on party reforms, despite not being the party chair. A few days before the January presidential election, he even said in an interview that Taiwanese “should believe [Chinese President] Xi Jinping (習近平).” His comments severely damaged the KMT’s electoral prospects.
If Tsai is perfectly capable of letting go and respecting President William Lai’s (賴清德) policy and party affairs decisions as both president and DPP chairman, and not putting forth new government policies or political arrangements, then other retired presidents in future should also be able to stand to the side and wait to be called on for help, thus creating a precedent for former Taiwanese presidents.
This could also be the starting point of a new chapter of a Taiwanese version of the “presidents’ club.” This would be a major, significant step in our nation’s democratization as we deepen our democracy. It could also allow our nation to grow into a more stable and robust, mature democracy.
Michael Lin holds a master’s degree from the National Taiwan University Graduate Institute of National Development.
Translated by Tim Smith
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS