Taiwan has been the focus of international media after former US president Donald Trump said the nation should pay the US for defense. Former Trump administration officials such as Elbridge Colby and Robert O’Brien believe Taiwan should boost defense spending to demonstrate its willingness to resist China. However, a narrow focus on spending distracts from more urgent issues the nation needs to address, which is making civil society more resilient in the face of external hostilities.
President William Lai (賴清德) last month announced the establishment of the Whole-of-Society Defense Resilience Committee to boost civil society’s resilience, including building up food and energy stockpiles, increasing labor resources and strengthening communication infrastructure.
Civil society resilience refers to the “ability to operate without disruption during crises, with citizens continuing to carry out their lives and perform their duties without panic,” Yen Wei-ting (顏維婷), an assistant professor of government at Pennsylvania’s Franklin & Marshall College, said in a commentary for the Brookings Institution.
At present, Taiwan is inhibited from building up its civil society resilience as there is no consensus on the nature of the security threat. Some politicians have even criticized the committee as a Democratic Progressive Party power grab, or denigrated civil society defense initiatives as a waste of time.
Finland, which has a more than 1,340km border with Russia, can offer lessons for Taiwan. Having fought multiple bloody wars against Russia, there is a strong consensus on the nature of the threat and the need for a robust national defense where everyone plays their part, which is beyond party politics.
As Finnish defense analyst Minna Alander said: “Finland has a pragmatic, largely nonideological approach to security and defense policy: Both nonalignment and the decision to join NATO were based on practical considerations.”
In her commentary on what lessons Taiwan can draw about civil society resilience from its COVID-19 pandemic response, Yen said that the nation’s pivotal early success in tackling COVID-19 was because of the nation’s swift “securitization” of the virus, including the use of warlike language, which helped to foster a “unified framework that helped citizens understand the situation and their roles, thereby reducing societal panic.”
The key to Taiwan’s pandemic success was that the government fostered a “whole-of-nation response” that unified the country to defeat a national security threat. However, Taiwan’s pandemic response effectiveness declined when the virus became “politicized,” Yen said.
This “not only amplified and exploited existing vulnerabilities, but also created openings for massive disinformation campaigns, which seriously undermined national unity and crippled effective governance,” she said.
A society’s willingness to defend itself is not only about readiness to fight, but also involves mental preparedness and resilience in the event that war should break out, she said. Simply pouring money into the national defense budget is not enough. Taiwan needs to conceptualize defense in wider terms and build a whole-of-society approach based on a consensus on the nature of the national security crisis.
It would be easier for Taiwanese to unite when there is a national consensus that an invasion by China constitutes a national security crisis. However, if political parties do not agree on the security threat, even this can become “a point of political contention, preventing societal unity,” as Yen said.
In seeking to make the nation more resilient, instead of thinking about “getting defense spending to 5 percent of GDP,” Taiwan should be thinking about “getting to Finland” — a comprehensive whole-of-society security approach based on the collective understanding of the threats the nation faces.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS