The return to power of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in Taiwan and the Bharatiya Janata Party in India marked a pivotal moment for advancing India-Taiwan relations.
With the DPP now in its third term and the National Democratic Alliance government in India, expectations for continuity are high. However, continuity alone might not suffice to deepen and expand this crucial partnership.
Despite recent electoral cycles and changes in leadership, significant progress in bilateral relations between Taiwan and India has been elusive.
While an exchange between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President William Lai (賴清德) on X following Modi’s re-election last month showed promise, a noticeable lull since then raises concerns about sustaining earlier gains.
The prior exposure of Modi to Taiwan and former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) to India before assuming office proved beneficial.
Ministers and officials in the Tsai administration emphasized India’s strategic and economic significance, laying the groundwork for bilateral cooperation between the two countries, a momentum that appears to be lacking right now.
Lai faces multiple challenges, including domestic issues, navigating the unpredictable twists and turns in the US presidential election campaign and managing China’s assertiveness.
Moreover, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) has not yet outlined specific foreign policy priorities.
Even though the progress in Taiwan-India relations has slowed for now, there are both challenges and opportunities for advancement, including several areas where the two governments could focus.
Economic ties between Taiwan and India show promise, but remain underdeveloped relative to their global trade capacities.
Although bilateral trade has reached US$10 billion, substantial room for growth exists, particularly in sectors such as semiconductor collaboration, where Indian interest in partnerships with Taiwanese firms like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co is notable. Strengthening economic bonds is crucial for fostering deeper political cooperation.
Tourism and cultural exchanges encounter obstacles, including visa complexities and limited direct travel options due to the lack of direct connectivity. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, Indian travelers interested in visiting Taiwan have been deterred by the lengthy visa process and layovers en route to Taiwan.
As Hong Kong becomes less favorable as a layover point, convenient and cheaper travel options to Taiwan have diminished. Improving direct connectivity and simplifying visa procedures for Indian tourists are critical steps toward unlocking the immense potential of cultural and tourism exchanges between India and Taiwan.
In terms of parliamentary exchanges, the India-Taiwan Parliamentary Friendship Forum, established in 2016 and revived in 2020, has faced interruptions. Limited interest and lobbying efforts among lawmakers from both countries have hindered sustained exchanges.
Remarkably, Indian Member of Parliament Sujit Kumar has been a staunch advocate of and visitor to Taiwan, providing a pathway to initiate exchanges. Revitalizing and expanding such exchanges could deepen mutual understanding and cooperation across sectors, thereby strengthening bilateral ties.
Awareness and understanding have also been stalled by incidents such as racist remarks against Indians following the signing of a labor agreement between India and Taiwan that was largely caused by a Chinese-led disinformation campaign.
However, there remains a significant lack of awareness among Taiwanese about Indians and their contributions. Bridging this gap requires fostering greater awareness and understanding between Taiwanese and Indians through cultural exchanges, educational programs and increased interactions.
These efforts can dispel misunderstandings and build mutual respect, promoting cultural diplomacy to highlight the positive aspects of their relationship and counteract misinformation.
In the absence of formal diplomatic ties, think tanks and political party dialogues play a crucial role. Initiatives such as the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation-led India-Taiwan dialogue demonstrate the potential of non-governmental engagements in deepening bilateral understanding and collaboration.
Additionally, establishing dialogues among political parties, similar to those between the DPP and Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party, could foster understanding and cooperation. These efforts facilitate deeper engagements, enhance mutual trust and pave the way for substantive cooperation across various domains.
It is imperative for Taiwan’s new government to reinvigorate the New Southbound Policy, with India being a key country in this initiative.
Amid China’s growing assertiveness and the uncertainties of the US elections, Taiwan must avoid putting all its eggs in one basket and continue cultivating new partnerships, with India as a top priority.
Mutual understanding of each other’s needs and interests is essential for advancing ties. India must not only have expectations, but also take responsibility, recognizing that economic engagement is crucial for its own interests, while political signaling holds significance for Taiwan, especially given its challenges with an assertive China.
The segregation between economic engagement and political signaling is no longer viable; concerted efforts are necessary to achieve meaningful progress in both.
Sana Hashmi is a fellow at the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation. The views expressed here are her own.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means