China officially avoided commenting on US Vice President Kamala Harris’ late entry into the US presidential race. However, Chinese state-backed news outlets and social media users cast her as a weak vice president whose candidacy did not present a major threat to the world’s No. 2 economy.
The Global Times, a Chinese Communist Party-backed media outlet, cited Chinese experts who called Harris’ performance in the White House “mediocre” and claimed she lacked the “experience and achievements to serve as president.”
Another Chinese state-run outlet highlighted former US president Donald Trump’s campaign trail claim Harris would be “easier to beat” than the sitting president.
“Does this mean Trump is set to win?” one person asked on a Chinese microblogging site, where the “Biden exit” hashtag garnered about 490 million views as users tried to parse what the shift meant for the Asian nation.
An online poll of 12,000 users of that platform found about 80 percent believed the Republicans would now prevail in the November vote, without portraying that as a negative outcome.
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Mao Ning (毛寧) on Monday sidestepped a question about US President Joe Biden’s decision to withdraw from the race and endorse his running mate, calling it a “domestic affair.”
“We will not comment on that,” she said at a regular briefing in Beijing.
Most analysts agreed Harris would, at least initially, bring continuity on trade and foreign policy, meaning little impact for Beijing on the switch-up in the likely Democratic candidate.
“There is a well-established strategic continuity that is driving the US position right now,” said Josef Gregory Mahoney, a professor of international relations at Shanghai’s East China Normal University.
“And at the level of whether it’s Biden or Trump or Harris, it’s really just a matter of style,” Mahoney said.
Fundamentally, the next president has to represent the economic and strategic interests of the US, he added.
Tensions between the world’s largest economies have flared in recent years over China’s military aggression toward Taiwan and Washington’s campaign to cut Beijing off from high-tech chips. While Biden used a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in San Francisco last year to steady ties, fresh US complaints about a surge in cheap Chinese exports are adding friction to the relationship.
Harris has only met Xi on the sidelines of a summit in Thailand and has not visited Beijing in her current role. While Biden is set to be the first US president since Jimmy Carter not to travel to China while in office — a point noted on X by former Global Times editor-in-chief Hu Xijin (胡錫進). Despite that, Biden has repeatedly touted spending “more time” with Xi than any other world leader at “about 90 hours.”
Harris, a former prosecutor, would need to quickly build trust with national security advisers to guide her on China policy, said Drew Thompson, a senior fellow at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy in Singapore.
“Harris does not have a track record on China, and it is not an area she is particularly comfortable,” added the former Pentagon official. “Biden has keen instincts and long-standing relationships with world leaders including Xi Jinping, but Harris does not.”
One asset she could leverage is California Governor Gavin Newsom, whose trip to China last year won praise inside the Asian nation for bringing a more constructive message of cooperation than visits from other Biden administration officials.
While Chinese citizens touted Newsom as a Biden replacement after the US president’s bad debate performance, the Californian has backed Harris for the ticket.
“Tough. Fearless. Tenacious,” he wrote of her on his official X page. “No one is better to prosecute the case against Donald Trump’s dark vision.”
Newsom in a senior Cabinet role could help Harris harness the rapport he has established with Chinese leaders. Both Democrats built their careers in California, the only US state to send a governor to Beijing for a meeting with Xi during Biden’s term and one with strong business ties to the Asian nation.
Harris’ public comments display a willingness to uphold the current administration’s tough stance on trade, which has seen Biden build on tariffs imposed by Trump. Those curbs have been justified as necessary for protecting both national security and US jobs.
Following a summit of Southeast Asian countries in Indonesia last year, Harris said there was a need to protect US interests and ensure “we are a leader in terms of the rules of the road, as opposed to following others’ rules.”
During that event, she slammed Beijing for “bullying,” citing its attempts at controlling access to the South China Sea, where China has sweeping claims of sovereignty.
Harris also visited Palawan, the Philippines, an island close to an area that is in heavy dispute between China and neighboring countries.
Harris’ foreign policy overall is expected to align with Biden’s, especially regarding China, said Zhu Junwei, a former researcher in the People’s Liberation Army who is now director of American research at Grandview Institution.
“The two parties don’t have much difference on China,” she said of Republicans and Democrats. “On China they’re quite the same.”
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises