Responding to KMT, TPP bill
A set of amendments that extend the powers of the Legislative Yuan were enacted last month with the support of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP).
In response, the Presidential Office, the Executive Yuan, the Control Yuan and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislative caucus each petitioned the Constitutional Court for a constitutional interpretation of the amendments and the temporary suspension of their implementation.
On Friday last week, the Constitutional Court approved the latter request.
The DPP called for all political parties to respect the ruling, while the Executive Yuan said it deeply admired the Constitutional Court for safeguarding the constitutional order and the public interest.
In contrast, the KMT said the ruling showed that judicial independence is dead and that the grand justices had become henchmen of a political party, the Presidential Office, the Executive Yuan and the Control Yuan.
TPP legislative caucus convener Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) said the court’s ruling was regrettable, but not surprising.
It is also not surprising that the backlash from the KMT and TPP has consisted of venting political emotions.
The Constitutional Court said its ruling was firmly based on the norms and framework of the Constitution. It refused to be intimidated by the attacks and vilification aimed at it by the KMT and TPP. Instead, it held the basic line defense of the constitutional order.
The Constitution does not say that the president must deliver a “state of the nation” address to the legislature, or answer legislators’ questions immediately or within a set period.
Such rules created by the amendments appear to overstep the boundaries of the powers of the Legislative Yuan, and conflict with the constitutional principle of the separation of powers.
The amendments stipulate that officials cannot refuse to answer questions or provide information in a legislative investigation, and cannot lie or behave in a way that is contemptuous of the legislature. Together with their punitive clauses, the amendments clearly encroach on the Executive Yuan’s power.
It is also doubtful that the legislature has the power to initiate the impeachment of the premier or other officials in the Executive Yuan, which has equal standing with the Legislative Yuan under the Constitution.
If the Constitutional Court had not suspended the implementation of the punitive clauses for “contempt of the legislature,” anyone could formally accuse administrative officials of such an offense, upon which prosecutors would have to investigate them. If that were to happen, the procedures could cause the accused officials significant and possibly irreparable harm.
The grounds cited by the Constitutional Court for its ruling are strong and persuasive, without bias or political considerations. The criticisms leveled at it by the KMT and TPP are therefore an attempt to shirk those two parties’ responsibility for proposing and enacting this reckless set of amendments.
Tien Fong-wen
New Taipei City
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises