While new immigrants and their children born in Taiwan have grown to a population of more than 1 million, the legislature in a late-night session on Tuesday last week passed a basic act governing “new residents” to facilitate their integration into Taiwanese society.
In addition to setting up a new special commission under the Executive Yuan to oversee new resident affairs and services, the act mandates that the government aid them with counseling, medical and maternity healthcare, employment rights protection, education, and cultural empowerment. It aims to protect their rights, help them obtain residency and integrate into a multicultural society in which all groups can prosper.
The bill would apply to foreigners, stateless people, and people from China, Hong Kong and Macau who are permitted to reside in Taiwan, or whose spouses are Taiwanese with household registration in Taiwan.
The act’s scope also extends to the children of new immigrants, and foreigners who reside in Taiwan through different immigration schemes other than marriage, such as professional and investment immigration. As the Cabinet aims to recruit up to 400,000 foreign workers by 2030 to address a labor shortage, the long-awaited new residents act would surely help to attract more talent to Taiwan.
Some provisions of the act, which was originally called the “new residents’ rights protection act,” have been changed due to proposals from the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party, which together hold a majority in the legislature. Some potential problems should also be noted.
Since it was extended to include immigrants from China, Hong Kong and Macau, the new act might potentially conflict with the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), which was specially authorized by the Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China (中華民國憲法增修條文) to handle cross-strait affairs, along with the Laws and Regulations Regarding Hong Kong and Macao Affairs (香港澳門關係條例).
Although Minister of the Interior Liu Shyh-fang (劉世芳) said that migrants from China would continue to be governed by the existing acts covering cross-strait affairs, some pro-China parties and lawmakers are expected to again propose to shorten the period required for the naturalization of Chinese spouses from six years to four years, in line with rules for other foreign spouses. Such proposals have consistently aroused massive concerns and opposition from the public over national security. They also risk worsening inequity among migrants from different countries, with Chinese migrants being able to maintain their nationalities while applying for Taiwanese citizenship, while other foreigners are required to renounce the citizenship of their homeland. Under the proposals, the parents of Chinese residents who are aged 70 or older could move to Taiwan to live as dependents, but not the parents of other foreign immigrants.
Under the new act, more than 65 percent of people who fit the description of “new residents” are Chinese spouses married to Taiwanese. An influx of Chinese immigrants might crowd out others for resources, some of which were created to recruit overseas professionals.
On the other hand, while expressing some support for the new residents act, migrants’ rights advocates have called for it to not just focus on white-collar professionals, but also do more to support Taiwan’s blue-collar migrant workers that could contribute more to industries facing a labor shortage. Not only to protect their basic rights, the act, which has been named as a basic law, should also do more to promote the value and importance of new residents in society, so that they could develop a stronger sense of belonging and identity.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS