What would you do with extra time in the day? Squeeze in that workout? Finally dust your living room? Maybe, like me, you would simply opt to get some more sleep.
Turns out our days are getting longer — but only by milliseconds. Not enough time for a nap, but long enough to wreak havoc with our computer systems.
Researchers at Swiss university ETH Zurich have shown how climate change is altering the length of a day. That will sound ridiculous to some, but the phenomenon is fairly well understood. As the planet warms, the polar ice caps are melting. That water flows into the oceans, particularly in the lower latitudes, making our planet bulge at the equator — and adding time to the day.
Illustration: Yusha
Benedikt Soja, professor of space geodesy (the use of precise measurements between space objects to determine and understand the Earth’s geometric shape, orientation and gravity field) at ETH Zurich and coauthor of the study, uses the example of a figure skater doing a pirouette to explain how this affects the planet’s rotation. The initially fast rotation when she is holding her arms close to her body slows as she stretches them out, because the mass moves away from the axis of rotation and increases physical inertia. You could try it for yourself with a spinning desk chair and a couple of heavy books if you have enough room and no coworkers hanging around who would give you funny looks.
As the planet’s mass becomes more oblate, or flatter, it spins more slowly and thus an Earth day gets longer. Soja’s team found that between 0.3 and 1 millisecond per century was added between 1900 and 2000 — since the millennium, the rate of change has accelerated to 1.3 milliseconds per century as ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica have shrunk faster.
The fact that our days are not fixed at precisely 86,400 seconds is not news, but culprits have largely been ever-changing factors outside of our control. For example, the 2004 Indonesian earthquake made the planet slightly less oblate — picture the figure skater pulling her arms in — and therefore shortened the day by 2.68 microseconds (1 microsecond is equal to 0.001 milliseconds).
For billions of years, the main factor governing the speed of the planet’s daily pirouetting has been the moon. As our planet spins, the moon tugs on the oceans creating high and low tides. As the Earth rotates faster than the moon orbits, this tugging saps our rotational energy and has slowed us down at a rate of 2.4 milliseconds per century.
The scientists at ETH Zurich suggest that unless we get a grip on our carbon emissions, melting polar ice caps could slow the Earth down by 2.6 milliseconds per century, making humans a bigger influence on our planetary motion than the moon.
Yet we have had a number of shorter days in recent decades, as scientists have observed the Earth speeding up. No one is really sure why. One explanation is that the spin of the Earth’s inner core has slowed down, meaning the mantle moves faster to maintain momentum. June 29, 2022, was the shortest day on record, being nearly 1.6 milliseconds under 24 hours, likely helped along by a change in wind speeds and shifting core dynamics.
Does any of this really matter if we are not going to get the benefit of more time on our hands? Actually, yes. The digital systems we use governing everything from global positioning systems to financial transactions rely on accurate timekeeping. That is why it is important to be able to understand the sum total of all the factors pushing and pulling the Earth’s rotation.
Since 1958, when we decided to sync up variable astronomical time and static atomic time, we have had to add 27 leap seconds to compensate for longer days, with the first added on June 30, 1972, but since scientists started noticing the Earth speeding up, talk has turned to negative leap seconds — rather than adding time, we would take it away.
This is the kind of thing that keeps scientists and engineers awake at night — a modern Y2K bug. No one expected to ever need a negative leap second, so it has never been tested.
As Patrizia Tavella, director of the Time department at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures, wrote in Nature: “The problems it could create are without precedent.”
Indeed, even leap seconds have proven problematic. In 2012, the addition sent Reddit dark and caused long flight delays in Australia. The extra second in 2015 broke several major Web sites and confused Android devices. In 2017, a number of Cloudflare servers were knocked offline.
Climate change is counteracting the more recent trend for shorter days, allowing a decision on the negative leap second to be postponed to 2029, according to a study this year. While some experts believe a negative leap second is inevitable, we will eventually abandon leap seconds entirely.
In 2022, the General Conference on Weights and Measures voted to end the leap second from 2035 for 100 years. During that century, the argument goes, we would devise a new way to synchronize human and planetary time.
Perhaps this should hasten the leap second’s demise. Not least because we have the tricky problem of halting climate change to focus on instead.
Lara Williams is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS