What would you do with extra time in the day? Squeeze in that workout? Finally dust your living room? Maybe, like me, you would simply opt to get some more sleep.
Turns out our days are getting longer — but only by milliseconds. Not enough time for a nap, but long enough to wreak havoc with our computer systems.
Researchers at Swiss university ETH Zurich have shown how climate change is altering the length of a day. That will sound ridiculous to some, but the phenomenon is fairly well understood. As the planet warms, the polar ice caps are melting. That water flows into the oceans, particularly in the lower latitudes, making our planet bulge at the equator — and adding time to the day.
Illustration: Yusha
Benedikt Soja, professor of space geodesy (the use of precise measurements between space objects to determine and understand the Earth’s geometric shape, orientation and gravity field) at ETH Zurich and coauthor of the study, uses the example of a figure skater doing a pirouette to explain how this affects the planet’s rotation. The initially fast rotation when she is holding her arms close to her body slows as she stretches them out, because the mass moves away from the axis of rotation and increases physical inertia. You could try it for yourself with a spinning desk chair and a couple of heavy books if you have enough room and no coworkers hanging around who would give you funny looks.
As the planet’s mass becomes more oblate, or flatter, it spins more slowly and thus an Earth day gets longer. Soja’s team found that between 0.3 and 1 millisecond per century was added between 1900 and 2000 — since the millennium, the rate of change has accelerated to 1.3 milliseconds per century as ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica have shrunk faster.
The fact that our days are not fixed at precisely 86,400 seconds is not news, but culprits have largely been ever-changing factors outside of our control. For example, the 2004 Indonesian earthquake made the planet slightly less oblate — picture the figure skater pulling her arms in — and therefore shortened the day by 2.68 microseconds (1 microsecond is equal to 0.001 milliseconds).
For billions of years, the main factor governing the speed of the planet’s daily pirouetting has been the moon. As our planet spins, the moon tugs on the oceans creating high and low tides. As the Earth rotates faster than the moon orbits, this tugging saps our rotational energy and has slowed us down at a rate of 2.4 milliseconds per century.
The scientists at ETH Zurich suggest that unless we get a grip on our carbon emissions, melting polar ice caps could slow the Earth down by 2.6 milliseconds per century, making humans a bigger influence on our planetary motion than the moon.
Yet we have had a number of shorter days in recent decades, as scientists have observed the Earth speeding up. No one is really sure why. One explanation is that the spin of the Earth’s inner core has slowed down, meaning the mantle moves faster to maintain momentum. June 29, 2022, was the shortest day on record, being nearly 1.6 milliseconds under 24 hours, likely helped along by a change in wind speeds and shifting core dynamics.
Does any of this really matter if we are not going to get the benefit of more time on our hands? Actually, yes. The digital systems we use governing everything from global positioning systems to financial transactions rely on accurate timekeeping. That is why it is important to be able to understand the sum total of all the factors pushing and pulling the Earth’s rotation.
Since 1958, when we decided to sync up variable astronomical time and static atomic time, we have had to add 27 leap seconds to compensate for longer days, with the first added on June 30, 1972, but since scientists started noticing the Earth speeding up, talk has turned to negative leap seconds — rather than adding time, we would take it away.
This is the kind of thing that keeps scientists and engineers awake at night — a modern Y2K bug. No one expected to ever need a negative leap second, so it has never been tested.
As Patrizia Tavella, director of the Time department at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures, wrote in Nature: “The problems it could create are without precedent.”
Indeed, even leap seconds have proven problematic. In 2012, the addition sent Reddit dark and caused long flight delays in Australia. The extra second in 2015 broke several major Web sites and confused Android devices. In 2017, a number of Cloudflare servers were knocked offline.
Climate change is counteracting the more recent trend for shorter days, allowing a decision on the negative leap second to be postponed to 2029, according to a study this year. While some experts believe a negative leap second is inevitable, we will eventually abandon leap seconds entirely.
In 2022, the General Conference on Weights and Measures voted to end the leap second from 2035 for 100 years. During that century, the argument goes, we would devise a new way to synchronize human and planetary time.
Perhaps this should hasten the leap second’s demise. Not least because we have the tricky problem of halting climate change to focus on instead.
Lara Williams is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Shortly after Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) stepped down as general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 2012, his successor, Xi Jinping (習近平), articulated the “Chinese Dream,” which aims to rejuvenate the nation and restore its historical glory. While defense analysts and media often focus on China’s potential conflict with Taiwan, achieving “rejuvenation” would require Beijing to engage in at least six different conflicts with at least eight countries. These include territories ranging from the South China Sea and East China Sea to Inner Asia, the Himalayas and lands lost to Russia. Conflicts would involve Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia,
The Sino-Indian border dispute remains one of the most complex and enduring border issues in the world. Unlike China’s borders with Russia and Vietnam, which have seen conflicts, but eventually led to settled agreements, the border with India, particularly the region of Arunachal Pradesh, remains a point of contention. This op-ed explores the historical and geopolitical nuances that contribute to this unresolved border dispute. The crux of the Sino-Indian border dispute lies in the differing interpretations of historical boundaries. The McMahon Line, established by the 1914 Simla Convention, was accepted by British India and Tibet, but never recognized by China, which
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and