Taiwan’s defense spending
Former US president Donald Trump’s national security adviser Robert O’Brien’s statement that Taiwan should significantly increase its defense spending in the face of potential Chinese aggression has sparked discussion.
Renowned Taiwanese economist Chieh Chung (揭仲), a researcher at the Taipei-based Association of Strategic Foresight, said that such a large percentage of defense spending (O’Brien suggested that Taiwan spend 5 percent of GDP on defense) is unreasonable during peacetime, and is likely to have a negative impact on the economic and social development of a democratic country.
Taiwan’s defense budget aims to improve the modernization of its military equipment, including the purchase of advanced fighter jets, missile systems, warships and drones to enhance air and sea defense capabilities, and to strengthen information warfare and cybersecurity capabilities to upgrade cyberprotection technology, establishing professional cybersecurity teams and promoting information warfare training.
Moreover, in addition to reforms to mandatory military service — which has been extended from four months to one year — the government has increased investment in military exercises and training to improve troops’ combat and emergency response capabilities.
It is also improving troop living conditions and welfare to improve morale and combat effectiveness.
Of course, the most important is that improvements to the nation’s logistical support capabilities and refining of the domestically built submarine program continue.
However, Trump publicly asked Taiwan to pay Washington more for “protection” during an interview with Bloomberg Businessweek.
He believes that Taiwan should share more of the defense costs, and would make this a condition for further US-Taiwan military cooperation, forcing Taipei to make more concessions on its defense budget to maintain cooperation with and support from the US. He has put the issue of Taiwan’s defense budget back on the table.
The call for the government to spend half of its budget on national defense has sparked debate in Taiwan.
In the face of external threats, Taiwan should focus on international cooperation and diplomatic means to ensure the nation’s defense, while also promoting sustainable economic and social development.
This is what is needed to truly realize national prosperity and public safety.
Wang Tien-yu
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS