Taiwan’s defense spending
Former US president Donald Trump’s national security adviser Robert O’Brien’s statement that Taiwan should significantly increase its defense spending in the face of potential Chinese aggression has sparked discussion.
Renowned Taiwanese economist Chieh Chung (揭仲), a researcher at the Taipei-based Association of Strategic Foresight, said that such a large percentage of defense spending (O’Brien suggested that Taiwan spend 5 percent of GDP on defense) is unreasonable during peacetime, and is likely to have a negative impact on the economic and social development of a democratic country.
Taiwan’s defense budget aims to improve the modernization of its military equipment, including the purchase of advanced fighter jets, missile systems, warships and drones to enhance air and sea defense capabilities, and to strengthen information warfare and cybersecurity capabilities to upgrade cyberprotection technology, establishing professional cybersecurity teams and promoting information warfare training.
Moreover, in addition to reforms to mandatory military service — which has been extended from four months to one year — the government has increased investment in military exercises and training to improve troops’ combat and emergency response capabilities.
It is also improving troop living conditions and welfare to improve morale and combat effectiveness.
Of course, the most important is that improvements to the nation’s logistical support capabilities and refining of the domestically built submarine program continue.
However, Trump publicly asked Taiwan to pay Washington more for “protection” during an interview with Bloomberg Businessweek.
He believes that Taiwan should share more of the defense costs, and would make this a condition for further US-Taiwan military cooperation, forcing Taipei to make more concessions on its defense budget to maintain cooperation with and support from the US. He has put the issue of Taiwan’s defense budget back on the table.
The call for the government to spend half of its budget on national defense has sparked debate in Taiwan.
In the face of external threats, Taiwan should focus on international cooperation and diplomatic means to ensure the nation’s defense, while also promoting sustainable economic and social development.
This is what is needed to truly realize national prosperity and public safety.
Wang Tien-yu
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS