Earlier this month, a worker at a branch of a large drinks chain was irritated because a customer had placed an order just before closing time, and she made a “spit special” drink for the customer to express her annoyance, later uploading a video of it online. That video, unsurprisingly, triggered a major uproar.
The worker in question later issued a statement on social media, but failed to express any contrition for her behavior, even complaining that she had already apologized, asking what more do people expect her to do.
This situation is an example of the deviation of values in Taiwan.
Judging the case as it stands, if a customer places an order before closing time, and if it delays employees getting off work, then the correct response would be to decline to accept the last-minute order. That said, since the person in question was being paid to work, the expectation would be that she should do her job properly during working hours. Even if tempers flare, the appropriate thing to do would be to find a resolution through normal channels. It is bad to vent your anger on customers, and stupid to film and upload a misconduct online.
If a store hires a poor performing employee and fails to fulfill supervisory responsibilities, the head office suffers damage to its reputation and the store might be subject to collateral penalties, forced to cease business and have its contract terminated.
Looking at Japan, early last year, a high-school student licked a soy sauce bottle at a sushi restaurant chain as a stupid prank, licking off a market value of ¥16 billion (US$102 million). Even if the teenager spends the rest of his life compensating for the company’s huge loss, it would still be a drop in the bucket. The parent company of the restaurant chain took legal action to prevent such pranks from recurring again.
Similarly, a few days ago in Taiwan, a college student put her pet, a lizard, on a plate of a restaurant, just before the “spit special” incident happened. These young Taiwanese are not motivated by revenge against a specific target, but rather by having “fun,” wanting to show off on the Internet, apparently unaware that their behavior is illegal.
As a junior-high schoolteacher, I often encourage students to challenge the system, instead of being the best behaved students, as long as they do not break the law or cause any trouble to others. Education should be the capacity that stays in the mind long after graduation, and the most basic thing is to know what you can do and what you cannot do in life.
If young people do something silly, they would be disciplined by their parents at home, and would receive demerits from their teachers at school, but they might face legal penalties for playing pranks after entering the workplace. People say that it is not shameful to do something wrong, but it is shameful to repeat bad behavior. Now, perhaps we need to add: the most shameful thing is to do something wrong, and to film and upload it online without knowing that it is wrong.
Lin Cheng-wu is a junior-high schoolteacher.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself