As a relative newcomer from Vietnam, who obtained my permanent residence in Taiwan this year, I feel that what we new residents really need is not protection, but rather help to become valued talent in business, government and academia, and to be channeled into the employment and corporate markets.
The government should not shorten the length of residency required to apply for naturalization, if it applied to certain nationalities only, because that would be very unfair. Nationality is a benefit bestowed by the country concerned and it is also a sacred thing, so it should not be relaxed for a particular group, but rather for foreign nationals who have contributed to Taiwanese society and to the nation’s industries, defense and economy.
The government’s vision and strategic orientation need to be relaxed. New residents are people, just like ordinary Taiwanese, especially those who come from Southeast Asian countries. We are not less intelligent, capable or educated than anyone else. Rather than protection, the question is whether we can apply our unique strengths to contribute to Taiwan.
If enacted, the “new residents’ protection law” drafted by the Ministry of the Interior would just be a bonus measure, just like mother-tongue education. It would not be particularly helpful to the real economy and the national orientation, and it treats new residents as a disadvantaged group. The focus should be on policies that encourage new residents to learn their mother tongues, and to learn enough of them to help them find employment and develop their skills.
For example, if one of a child’s parents is Vietnamese and if the child can speak Vietnamese, could the government give them a scholarship to study in certain departments? If the child joins the military, be it in compulsory or voluntary service, could they be selected to study in intelligence units such as the Ministry of National Defense’s Military Intelligence Bureau or Political Warfare Bureau, the National Security Bureau, the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau or the Coast Guard Administration, where they could undergo intelligence and combat training, and learn military and intelligence-related to the Vietnamese language? Could such young people study at the Military Academy or other schools for commissioned or noncommissioned officers? Could they be classified as special talents, so that their social status can be elevated and they can be considered an honorable and practical talent? The vulnerable need protection, but we do not really need it.
Eight years ago, when many Taiwanese businesspeople moved their operations from China to Southeast Asia, they complained about the shortage of Taiwanese managers who knew anything about Southeast Asian countries.
However, the government failed to solve this problem. Although the number of Taiwanese entrepreneurs investing in Southeast Asia overtook the number investing in China in 2002, the vast majority of those Taiwanese investors remained attached to China.
This was because China already had control of ethnic Chinese entrepreneurs’ networks in the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. Taiwanese entrepreneurs’ lack of knowledge about Southeast Asian countries makes them depend on guidance from those Chinese entrepreneurs.
Given this situation, dealing with the lack of a Southeast Asian talent pool would be much more beneficial to new residents than the planned “new residents’ protection law.”
Nguyen Thi Thanh Ngan is the founder of Study Vietnamese Every Day.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS