As a relative newcomer from Vietnam, who obtained my permanent residence in Taiwan this year, I feel that what we new residents really need is not protection, but rather help to become valued talent in business, government and academia, and to be channeled into the employment and corporate markets.
The government should not shorten the length of residency required to apply for naturalization, if it applied to certain nationalities only, because that would be very unfair. Nationality is a benefit bestowed by the country concerned and it is also a sacred thing, so it should not be relaxed for a particular group, but rather for foreign nationals who have contributed to Taiwanese society and to the nation’s industries, defense and economy.
The government’s vision and strategic orientation need to be relaxed. New residents are people, just like ordinary Taiwanese, especially those who come from Southeast Asian countries. We are not less intelligent, capable or educated than anyone else. Rather than protection, the question is whether we can apply our unique strengths to contribute to Taiwan.
If enacted, the “new residents’ protection law” drafted by the Ministry of the Interior would just be a bonus measure, just like mother-tongue education. It would not be particularly helpful to the real economy and the national orientation, and it treats new residents as a disadvantaged group. The focus should be on policies that encourage new residents to learn their mother tongues, and to learn enough of them to help them find employment and develop their skills.
For example, if one of a child’s parents is Vietnamese and if the child can speak Vietnamese, could the government give them a scholarship to study in certain departments? If the child joins the military, be it in compulsory or voluntary service, could they be selected to study in intelligence units such as the Ministry of National Defense’s Military Intelligence Bureau or Political Warfare Bureau, the National Security Bureau, the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau or the Coast Guard Administration, where they could undergo intelligence and combat training, and learn military and intelligence-related to the Vietnamese language? Could such young people study at the Military Academy or other schools for commissioned or noncommissioned officers? Could they be classified as special talents, so that their social status can be elevated and they can be considered an honorable and practical talent? The vulnerable need protection, but we do not really need it.
Eight years ago, when many Taiwanese businesspeople moved their operations from China to Southeast Asia, they complained about the shortage of Taiwanese managers who knew anything about Southeast Asian countries.
However, the government failed to solve this problem. Although the number of Taiwanese entrepreneurs investing in Southeast Asia overtook the number investing in China in 2002, the vast majority of those Taiwanese investors remained attached to China.
This was because China already had control of ethnic Chinese entrepreneurs’ networks in the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. Taiwanese entrepreneurs’ lack of knowledge about Southeast Asian countries makes them depend on guidance from those Chinese entrepreneurs.
Given this situation, dealing with the lack of a Southeast Asian talent pool would be much more beneficial to new residents than the planned “new residents’ protection law.”
Nguyen Thi Thanh Ngan is the founder of Study Vietnamese Every Day.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS