This year’s Advanced Subjects Test, the second round of the joint college entrance examination, was held on Friday and Saturday last week.
A number of cram school teachers have analyzed the test questions for the Citizenship and Society subject, and have come to the conclusion that although the test was already more difficult than usual last year, this year’s test was even harder.
Their main problem with the test was that its scope was too broad and the test was too subjective.
It was as if it was trying to trick the students, whose confidence might be impacted negatively as a result, some teachers said.
Some teachers have been calling on the College Entrance Examination Center to return to the textbook materials used previously.
However, Deputy Minister of Education Yeh Ping-cheng (葉丙成) said that some cram school teachers still do not understand, and are not willing to understand, the new trends in education, adding that their teaching might be stuck in traditional aspects such as rote memorization and problem-solving techniques.
Instead of denouncing the test questions, it would be better to spend more time understanding the new trends and reformulating one’s approach to teaching, Yeh said.
His comment was quite right.
Academia Sinica researcher Ma Chung-pei (馬中珮) said that she recalls when she was a primary and secondary-school student in Taiwan, she had to spend a lot of time studying for exams to get high scores and enter into a good university.
She would have preferred to spend more time on her favorite subjects, such as mathematics, science and music, and less time on other subjects in school, but she did not have that choice in Taiwan, Ma said.
Luckily, her son did, because he was educated in the US.
The renowned scientist Albert Einstein loved mathematics and science in high school, and hated grammar courses in Latin or Greek. It was only when he transferred to the free-spirited Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich that he was able to fully play into his mathematical and scientific talents.
In other words, the test questions for Citizenship and Society are not too difficult. Students should try to be flexible and not limit their creativity by learning only what is in the textbooks.
Secondary-school education in Europe, the US and Japan does not only focus on textbooks: Students often read extracurricular books they can discuss in the classroom.
Teachers do not require students to memorize the content of the textbooks, but to be able to discuss and criticize — to develop the ability to think and express themselves. This is perhaps the true education.
If teachers in Taiwan do not change their teaching methods, do not strive for improvement, and only know textbooks and fill in the blanks, then it is no wonder students are not interested in learning.
Teng Hon-yuan is a university professor.
Translated by Eddy Chang
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
RSS