This year’s Advanced Subjects Test, the second round of the joint college entrance examination, was held on Friday and Saturday last week.
A number of cram school teachers have analyzed the test questions for the Citizenship and Society subject, and have come to the conclusion that although the test was already more difficult than usual last year, this year’s test was even harder.
Their main problem with the test was that its scope was too broad and the test was too subjective.
It was as if it was trying to trick the students, whose confidence might be impacted negatively as a result, some teachers said.
Some teachers have been calling on the College Entrance Examination Center to return to the textbook materials used previously.
However, Deputy Minister of Education Yeh Ping-cheng (葉丙成) said that some cram school teachers still do not understand, and are not willing to understand, the new trends in education, adding that their teaching might be stuck in traditional aspects such as rote memorization and problem-solving techniques.
Instead of denouncing the test questions, it would be better to spend more time understanding the new trends and reformulating one’s approach to teaching, Yeh said.
His comment was quite right.
Academia Sinica researcher Ma Chung-pei (馬中珮) said that she recalls when she was a primary and secondary-school student in Taiwan, she had to spend a lot of time studying for exams to get high scores and enter into a good university.
She would have preferred to spend more time on her favorite subjects, such as mathematics, science and music, and less time on other subjects in school, but she did not have that choice in Taiwan, Ma said.
Luckily, her son did, because he was educated in the US.
The renowned scientist Albert Einstein loved mathematics and science in high school, and hated grammar courses in Latin or Greek. It was only when he transferred to the free-spirited Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich that he was able to fully play into his mathematical and scientific talents.
In other words, the test questions for Citizenship and Society are not too difficult. Students should try to be flexible and not limit their creativity by learning only what is in the textbooks.
Secondary-school education in Europe, the US and Japan does not only focus on textbooks: Students often read extracurricular books they can discuss in the classroom.
Teachers do not require students to memorize the content of the textbooks, but to be able to discuss and criticize — to develop the ability to think and express themselves. This is perhaps the true education.
If teachers in Taiwan do not change their teaching methods, do not strive for improvement, and only know textbooks and fill in the blanks, then it is no wonder students are not interested in learning.
Teng Hon-yuan is a university professor.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS