In an attempt to garner support from young people, the governing Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) Department of Youth Development hosted its annual Public Service Flagship Camp (國務青旗艦營) from Thursday to Saturday last week.
The average age of participants was 21, and the party held various activities such as lectures, outdoor visits and “Model Ruling Party” in which participants simulated the roles of government officials.
The event, dubbed the “Democracy Recharge Station,” featured prominent political figures such as President and DPP Chairman William Lai (賴清德), Presidential Office spokesperson Kuo Ya-hui (郭雅慧), Vice Premier Cheng Li-chiun (鄭麗君) and other people from different government agencies.
Offering lectures and engaging in discussions with participants, distinguished guests managed to obtain decent insights about the young generation’s attitude toward the ruling party.
The lectures and discussions covered numerous topics, including the recent Bluebird movement, the policy framework of the Executive Yuan and the challenges the ruling party face.
During the Model Ruling Party session, participants were tasked to devise strategies that would help the party reach out to the young generation and present their proposals to Lai the following day.
On the last day of the camp, Lai said he appreciated the participants for giving the DPP innovative advice to maximize its youth support.
The president also outlined three main issues that are jeopardizing Taiwan’s democracy, namely the incessant conflicts among political parties in the Legislative Yuan, divided views on national identity and the threat of totalitarianism.
He encouraged the participants to continuously raise new ideas and protect the democratic values enjoyed by the Taiwanese society, so that these problems can be effectively eliminated.
Upon the completion of the three-day camp, most participants held a favorable attitude toward the DPP’s endeavor to boost youth support.
Many said that the party has become more active in seeking young people’s thoughts on recent political issues, enabling the government to adjust its policies in alignment with the youth’s voices.
DPP Youth Director Juan Chun-ta (阮俊達) also said he was surprised by the rise in female participation in the camp, emphasizing that promoting gender equality in political affairs would bolster the party’s public approval in the long term.
Aside from the Flagship Camp, the DPP has also been holding other events to secure youth support.
Since the presidential and legislative elections, the ruling party has been regularly hosting workshops in many regions, which has provided the young generation with opportunities to exchange perspectives with the political figures on diverse issues.
It has also been producing online content such as YouTube videos and podcast episodes, making current affairs more accessible to its young audience.
These efforts, coupled with controversies over the opposition majority’s legislative reforms, seem to have begun paying off.
A poll released by the Taiwan Public Opinion Foundation on Tuesday showed that 63.1 percent of respondents aged between 20 and 24 approved of Lai’s handling of national affairs.
However, due to former vice premier Cheng Wen-tsan’s (鄭文燦) suspected involvement in a corruption case, support for the DPP fell, decreasing from 37.4 percent last month to 33.1 percent this month, the poll showed.
The decline in party support indicates that despite leading in all recent polls, the governing party still needs to steadfastly maintain its political integrity in order to consolidate voters’ support.
Furthermore, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party are also consistently intensifying efforts to augment their online visibility, which might lead to heightened competition among the major political parties.
As the Internet gradually becomes most people’s main source of news and information, modern technology is expected to have a significant impact on voters’ political tendencies in the future.
All political parties must therefore strive to enhance their online influence, so that they can successfully acquire the support of a wider spectrum of voters.
Tshua Siu-ui is a Taiwanese student studying international relations and politics in Norwich, England.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS