The Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau intends to investigate allegations of Chinese infiltration through a third-party committee, sources said on July 4.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is increasingly using Taiwan’s democracy and freedom against it, recruiting Taiwanese for espionage and interfering in Taiwan’s elections through influence campaigns, bureau Director-General Chen Pai-li (陳白立) said.
Suspects in such trials are regularly acquitted due to lack of evidence and difficulty tracing funds back to the CCP.
Then on Tuesday last week, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators passed a bill that removed restrictions on group tours to China and prioritizes Chinese tourists and tour groups wanting to visit Kinmen, Penghu and Lienchiang (Matsu) counties.
It would be difficult for customs and immigration authorities to know whether Chinese visitors have ties to the CCP, and investigators would be hard-pressed to track the movements of all Chinese visitors for obvious logistical and legal reasons.
A CCP member visited the Institute for National Defense and Security Research — a Ministry of National Defense think tank — last year as part of a delegation, said the Liberty Times, sister paper of the Taipei Times.
Prioritizing Chinese tourism to Taiwan’s outlying islands could compromise the integrity of those islands, which are important to Taiwan’s defense strategy. That importance is evident in the stationing of US Army Special Forces personnel in Kinmen and Penghu, which was confirmed by Minister of National Defense Chiu Kuo-cheng (邱國正) on March 14.
Despite prevailing concerns about espionage, KMT legislators Chen Hsueh-sheng (陳雪生) and Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) on July 4 proposed amendments to the Offshore Islands Development Act (離島建設條例) that would allow Chinese firms to tender for industrial development and public construction projects in outlying counties.
The amendments would have given unfettered access in the counties to Chinese employees of firms who win public tenders. Fortunately, the bill was halted when TPP caucus whip Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) said that his party would not support it.
The committee, which the Investigation Bureau established jointly with the National Security Bureau, the Mainland Affairs Council and the Military Intelligence Bureau, must be aggressive in tackling espionage cases to prevent the CCP from making inroads. Taiwanese collaborators must not be acquitted nor shown leniency, as this would only encourage others to work for the CCP, knowing they could do so with impunity.
Senior prosecutors said the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) does not need to be revised to pursue spying cases, but prosecutors need clearer targets. This might be true, but judicial authorities and investigators should also seek to understand why judges are so reluctant to prosecute those facing allegations of spying for the CCP.
The failure of Taiwan’s laws and the Constitution to identify China as a foreign power contributes to the difficulty in trying espionage cases involving the CCP. That suggests that laws might indeed need to be amended. However, if the problem lies in a lack of evidence, then the responsibility would fall on investigators. Hopefully, that is something the new committee can help rectify.
Regardless of how it is achieved, prosecutors and investigators must seek to punish those who compromise Taiwan’s sovereignty and national security by acting on behalf of the CCP. The US, Japan and other countries might be willing to assist Taiwan in the event of a conflict, but Taiwan must also demonstrate the resolve to protect itself.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS