Cries of political persecution
Last year, sinkholes in Jhubei City (竹北), Hsinchu County, caused multiple gas and water lines to rupture. After an investigation, the Hsinchu District Prosecutors’ Office indicted 12 people, including Hsinchu County Commissioner Yang Wen-ke (楊文科) and Yang’s senior secretary, Chiang Liang-yuan (江良淵), for profiting from illegal resumption of work, document forgery and perjury.
Prosecutors recommended that the court impose a harsh sentence and confiscate NT$250 million (US$7.67 million) of illegal gains from the defendants. Yang maintained his innocence and stated that the prosecutors had no concrete evidence against him.
Yilan County Commissioner Lin Zi-miao (林姿妙) is suspected of money laundering and illegally issuing certificates for agricultural land. Prosecutors have charged her with corruption, money laundering and forgery, among other crimes. She is currently being tried by the Yilan District Court.
Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) was indicted by prosecutors due to a lawsuit involving wage fraud regarding her legislative assistants during her tenure as a legislator. The Taipei District Court is set to announce their verdict on this case next week. Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) is also being investigated on suspicion of multiple serious crimes including robbery and coercion.
Yang, Lin, Kao and Hsieh are all incumbent city or county heads with substantial and direct influence who are guilty of corruption and other crimes. Why have they not been detained?
Former Taoyuan mayor Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦), who is being investigated on suspicion of bribery and corruption, was detained on accusations of accepting NT$5 million in bribes. Yang and the others are accused of accepting illegal gains of NT$250 million. Should these not be even more cause for detainment? The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) should not be making accusations of political interference by judicial means.
Once a case reaches prosecutorial investigation or a court hearing, all political parties and politicians should cease talk of political persecution so as to not influence the trial.
Chi An-hsiu
Taipei
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS