Cries of political persecution
Last year, sinkholes in Jhubei City (竹北), Hsinchu County, caused multiple gas and water lines to rupture. After an investigation, the Hsinchu District Prosecutors’ Office indicted 12 people, including Hsinchu County Commissioner Yang Wen-ke (楊文科) and Yang’s senior secretary, Chiang Liang-yuan (江良淵), for profiting from illegal resumption of work, document forgery and perjury.
Prosecutors recommended that the court impose a harsh sentence and confiscate NT$250 million (US$7.67 million) of illegal gains from the defendants. Yang maintained his innocence and stated that the prosecutors had no concrete evidence against him.
Yilan County Commissioner Lin Zi-miao (林姿妙) is suspected of money laundering and illegally issuing certificates for agricultural land. Prosecutors have charged her with corruption, money laundering and forgery, among other crimes. She is currently being tried by the Yilan District Court.
Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) was indicted by prosecutors due to a lawsuit involving wage fraud regarding her legislative assistants during her tenure as a legislator. The Taipei District Court is set to announce their verdict on this case next week. Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) is also being investigated on suspicion of multiple serious crimes including robbery and coercion.
Yang, Lin, Kao and Hsieh are all incumbent city or county heads with substantial and direct influence who are guilty of corruption and other crimes. Why have they not been detained?
Former Taoyuan mayor Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦), who is being investigated on suspicion of bribery and corruption, was detained on accusations of accepting NT$5 million in bribes. Yang and the others are accused of accepting illegal gains of NT$250 million. Should these not be even more cause for detainment? The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) should not be making accusations of political interference by judicial means.
Once a case reaches prosecutorial investigation or a court hearing, all political parties and politicians should cease talk of political persecution so as to not influence the trial.
Chi An-hsiu
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS