Cries of political persecution
Last year, sinkholes in Jhubei City (竹北), Hsinchu County, caused multiple gas and water lines to rupture. After an investigation, the Hsinchu District Prosecutors’ Office indicted 12 people, including Hsinchu County Commissioner Yang Wen-ke (楊文科) and Yang’s senior secretary, Chiang Liang-yuan (江良淵), for profiting from illegal resumption of work, document forgery and perjury.
Prosecutors recommended that the court impose a harsh sentence and confiscate NT$250 million (US$7.67 million) of illegal gains from the defendants. Yang maintained his innocence and stated that the prosecutors had no concrete evidence against him.
Yilan County Commissioner Lin Zi-miao (林姿妙) is suspected of money laundering and illegally issuing certificates for agricultural land. Prosecutors have charged her with corruption, money laundering and forgery, among other crimes. She is currently being tried by the Yilan District Court.
Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) was indicted by prosecutors due to a lawsuit involving wage fraud regarding her legislative assistants during her tenure as a legislator. The Taipei District Court is set to announce their verdict on this case next week. Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) is also being investigated on suspicion of multiple serious crimes including robbery and coercion.
Yang, Lin, Kao and Hsieh are all incumbent city or county heads with substantial and direct influence who are guilty of corruption and other crimes. Why have they not been detained?
Former Taoyuan mayor Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦), who is being investigated on suspicion of bribery and corruption, was detained on accusations of accepting NT$5 million in bribes. Yang and the others are accused of accepting illegal gains of NT$250 million. Should these not be even more cause for detainment? The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) should not be making accusations of political interference by judicial means.
Once a case reaches prosecutorial investigation or a court hearing, all political parties and politicians should cease talk of political persecution so as to not influence the trial.
Chi An-hsiu
Taipei
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means