Former vice premier Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) has been detained for alleged corruption after reportedly receiving NT$5 million in bribes from a senior Formosa Plastics Group executive. His detention shocked the local political and business circles.
The corruption case reflects an illicit relationship between the government and political factions. Moreover, it exposes a grave problem of corruption that has long existed in Taiwan’s business culture. This has not only crushed public trust in our government and politics, but also tarnished a company’s public image and stunted its sustainable development potential.
Cheng’s detention is a wake-up call, with a pall of tension descending on the political and business worlds, and this is where anti-corruption measures must be brought to bear.
In addition to cleaning up politics, anti-corruption efforts should be extended to the business world to prevent the same illegal situation from recurring.
Cheng’s case has made it apparent that there is no corruption without corporate bribery. Officials involved in corruption suffer harsh penalties in accordance with the Anti-Corruption Act (貪汙治罪條例), which, no doubt, acts as a deterrent. On the other hand, the need for anti-corruption measures in business, including offering or accepting bribes, is not taken seriously enough.
This year, I participated in the biennial International Anti-Corruption Conference (IACC), held in Vilnius, Lithuania, from June 18 to 21. This meeting was hosted by Transparency International, an international non-governmental organization. Because business integrity was a dominant issue, two forums were organized at the IACC based on the UN Global Compact.
There are 10 principles in the UN Global Compact, all of which are associated with the UN’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Among the principles, the 10th one is “businesses should fight against corruption in all its forms, including extortion and bribery.”
Promoting anti-corruption in business benefits sustainable development and connects with the UN’s policymaking. People of Chinese descent often emphasize social and interpersonal bonds, so the business culture shaped by this thinking becomes gradually entrenched, to the detriment of sustainable development.
Promoting the concept of environment, social and governance in Taiwanese businesses is now in full swing, but regrettably, business integrity has yet to be introduced.
In my opinion, this is not enough. I found that according to the UN Global Compact, business integrity should be included in business governance, which would in turn influence the environment and society.
Businesses have a responsibility to combat corruption, but the government is not an outsider in this. In response to the current social climate, good government policymaking drives away corruption in businesses.
Yang Yung-nane is a political science professor at National Cheng Kung University and a member of the board of directors of Transparency International Chinese Taipei.
Translated by Chen Chi-huang
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS