Former vice premier Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) has been detained for alleged corruption after reportedly receiving NT$5 million in bribes from a senior Formosa Plastics Group executive. His detention shocked the local political and business circles.
The corruption case reflects an illicit relationship between the government and political factions. Moreover, it exposes a grave problem of corruption that has long existed in Taiwan’s business culture. This has not only crushed public trust in our government and politics, but also tarnished a company’s public image and stunted its sustainable development potential.
Cheng’s detention is a wake-up call, with a pall of tension descending on the political and business worlds, and this is where anti-corruption measures must be brought to bear.
In addition to cleaning up politics, anti-corruption efforts should be extended to the business world to prevent the same illegal situation from recurring.
Cheng’s case has made it apparent that there is no corruption without corporate bribery. Officials involved in corruption suffer harsh penalties in accordance with the Anti-Corruption Act (貪汙治罪條例), which, no doubt, acts as a deterrent. On the other hand, the need for anti-corruption measures in business, including offering or accepting bribes, is not taken seriously enough.
This year, I participated in the biennial International Anti-Corruption Conference (IACC), held in Vilnius, Lithuania, from June 18 to 21. This meeting was hosted by Transparency International, an international non-governmental organization. Because business integrity was a dominant issue, two forums were organized at the IACC based on the UN Global Compact.
There are 10 principles in the UN Global Compact, all of which are associated with the UN’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Among the principles, the 10th one is “businesses should fight against corruption in all its forms, including extortion and bribery.”
Promoting anti-corruption in business benefits sustainable development and connects with the UN’s policymaking. People of Chinese descent often emphasize social and interpersonal bonds, so the business culture shaped by this thinking becomes gradually entrenched, to the detriment of sustainable development.
Promoting the concept of environment, social and governance in Taiwanese businesses is now in full swing, but regrettably, business integrity has yet to be introduced.
In my opinion, this is not enough. I found that according to the UN Global Compact, business integrity should be included in business governance, which would in turn influence the environment and society.
Businesses have a responsibility to combat corruption, but the government is not an outsider in this. In response to the current social climate, good government policymaking drives away corruption in businesses.
Yang Yung-nane is a political science professor at National Cheng Kung University and a member of the board of directors of Transparency International Chinese Taipei.
Translated by Chen Chi-huang
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS