Former vice premier Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) has been detained for alleged corruption after reportedly receiving NT$5 million in bribes from a senior Formosa Plastics Group executive. His detention shocked the local political and business circles.
The corruption case reflects an illicit relationship between the government and political factions. Moreover, it exposes a grave problem of corruption that has long existed in Taiwan’s business culture. This has not only crushed public trust in our government and politics, but also tarnished a company’s public image and stunted its sustainable development potential.
Cheng’s detention is a wake-up call, with a pall of tension descending on the political and business worlds, and this is where anti-corruption measures must be brought to bear.
In addition to cleaning up politics, anti-corruption efforts should be extended to the business world to prevent the same illegal situation from recurring.
Cheng’s case has made it apparent that there is no corruption without corporate bribery. Officials involved in corruption suffer harsh penalties in accordance with the Anti-Corruption Act (貪汙治罪條例), which, no doubt, acts as a deterrent. On the other hand, the need for anti-corruption measures in business, including offering or accepting bribes, is not taken seriously enough.
This year, I participated in the biennial International Anti-Corruption Conference (IACC), held in Vilnius, Lithuania, from June 18 to 21. This meeting was hosted by Transparency International, an international non-governmental organization. Because business integrity was a dominant issue, two forums were organized at the IACC based on the UN Global Compact.
There are 10 principles in the UN Global Compact, all of which are associated with the UN’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Among the principles, the 10th one is “businesses should fight against corruption in all its forms, including extortion and bribery.”
Promoting anti-corruption in business benefits sustainable development and connects with the UN’s policymaking. People of Chinese descent often emphasize social and interpersonal bonds, so the business culture shaped by this thinking becomes gradually entrenched, to the detriment of sustainable development.
Promoting the concept of environment, social and governance in Taiwanese businesses is now in full swing, but regrettably, business integrity has yet to be introduced.
In my opinion, this is not enough. I found that according to the UN Global Compact, business integrity should be included in business governance, which would in turn influence the environment and society.
Businesses have a responsibility to combat corruption, but the government is not an outsider in this. In response to the current social climate, good government policymaking drives away corruption in businesses.
Yang Yung-nane is a political science professor at National Cheng Kung University and a member of the board of directors of Transparency International Chinese Taipei.
Translated by Chen Chi-huang
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS