The 2023 Democracy Index report, released early this year by the London-based Economist Intelligence Unit, showed that Taiwan retained its top ranking in Asia and ranked 10th globally. Receiving an overall score of 8.92 out of 10, Taiwan is the beacon of democracy in Asia, ahead of Japan, 16th; South Korea, 22nd; Malaysia, 40th; and China, 148th.
On the other hand, in Transparency International’s 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index — the leading global indicator of public sector corruption, which measures government transparency — Taiwan scored 67 and ranked 28 out of 180 countries.
There appears to be a significant disparity between Taiwanese democracy and transparency. It indicates that the rule of law is not as deeply rooted in its society and culture in comparison with democracy and freedom, and public sector corruption has room for improvement.
As this dampens people’s trust in political parties and the judiciary, this might well have been the reason why the public handed a third party leverage in the Legislative Yuan, in an attempt to help discipline the governing party.
The major government institutions responsible for guarding against corruption are the Control Yuan and the Ministry of Justice. As members of the Control Yuan and the Executive Yuan are appointed by the president and presumably from the same party, that could easily defeat their supervisory purpose. Moreover, the president of the Control Yuan — who is more of a symbolic leader — lacks a professional team of investigators and prosecutors to carry out fact-finding tasks.
The minister of justice is the nation’s top cop — the chief law enforcement officer. However, one minister of justice in recent years resigned due to influence peddling.
The opposition’s move to expand their legislative power to tackle corruption might be well intentioned. However, the rush to push new laws has yielded numerous problems; among them, violation of the Constitution and checks and balances — the very foundation of democracy. It cannot be overemphasized that the rule of law is more than just a law of rules.
Last week’s Constitutional Court meeting to review controversial legislation has demonstrated the court’s ability to seek truth and facts. The public can expect the court to articulate persuasive reasons. It is a blessing to have such a bedrock to uphold the rule of law and constitutional governance.
Moreover, the detention last week of one of the most prominent politicians in the green camp shows the determination of the newly appointed minister of justice to pursue corruption regardless of party affiliation. Once it is clear that the Ministry of Justice can handle the truth, it would be a giant step forward for the rule of law and for shaping the political arena.
After these recent political events, it is interesting to note that a survey of young voters aged 20 to 24 showed a sharp increase — more than 25 percentage points — in support for the president. While the youth group played a role in giving the opposition parties a majority in the Legislative Yuan to check on the administration, they are smart and mature enough to place democracy and the rule of law above party affiliation.
It is clear the future of democratic Taiwan is in the hands of young people. As former US Supreme Court justice Felix Frankfurter said: “In a democracy, the highest office is the office of citizen.”
James J. Y. Hsu is a retired professor of theoretical physics.
The 75th anniversary summit of NATO was held in Washington from Tuesday to Thursday last week. Its main focus was the reinvigoration and revitalization of NATO, along with its expansion. The shadow of domestic electoral politics could not be avoided. The focus was on whether US President Biden would deliver his speech at the NATO summit cogently. Biden’s fitness to run in the next US presidential election in November was under assessment. NATO is acquiring more coherence and teeth. These were perhaps more evident than Biden’s future. The link to the Biden candidacy is critical for NATO. If Biden loses
Shortly after Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) stepped down as general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 2012, his successor, Xi Jinping (習近平), articulated the “Chinese Dream,” which aims to rejuvenate the nation and restore its historical glory. While defense analysts and media often focus on China’s potential conflict with Taiwan, achieving “rejuvenation” would require Beijing to engage in at least six different conflicts with at least eight countries. These include territories ranging from the South China Sea and East China Sea to Inner Asia, the Himalayas and lands lost to Russia. Conflicts would involve Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia,
Japan and the Philippines on Monday signed a defense agreement that would facilitate joint drills between them. The pact was made “as both face an increasingly assertive China,” and is in line with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr’s “effort to forge security alliances to bolster the Philippine military’s limited ability to defend its territorial interests in the South China Sea,” The Associated Press (AP) said. The pact also comes on the heels of comments by former US deputy national security adviser Matt Pottinger, who said at a forum on Tuesday last week that China’s recent aggression toward the Philippines in
The Sino-Indian border dispute remains one of the most complex and enduring border issues in the world. Unlike China’s borders with Russia and Vietnam, which have seen conflicts, but eventually led to settled agreements, the border with India, particularly the region of Arunachal Pradesh, remains a point of contention. This op-ed explores the historical and geopolitical nuances that contribute to this unresolved border dispute. The crux of the Sino-Indian border dispute lies in the differing interpretations of historical boundaries. The McMahon Line, established by the 1914 Simla Convention, was accepted by British India and Tibet, but never recognized by China, which