A recent article said that Taichung Hong-en Hospital looked the other way while orderlies severely beat a 23-year-old patient surnamed Yang (楊), who was a ward of the state. This hospital has also been accused of allowing the sexual abuse of patients and engaging in insurance fraud. Seven of central Taiwan’s courts have announced that people who are wards of the state under guardianship or custody are to be admitted to this hospital for care.
In May, a man surnamed Chien (簡), who had been convicted of murder, had unsuccessfully attempted to apply for a psychiatric hospital to act as his guardian. He escaped from Nanguang Hospital in Keelung and was at large somewhere between Keelung and New Taipei City for four days before he was found and taken into custody. The court overseeing Chien’s case immediately sent him to Kaohsiung Municipal Kai-syuan Psychiatric Hospital — the nation’s only partial special judicial psychiatric hospital — for guardianship.
With the public’s rights and interests in mind, the government cannot waste more time. It must establish more special judicial psychiatric hospitals that can directly supervise patients like Chien.
In January 2022, the legislature passed amendments to the Criminal Code, Article 87 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Rehabilitative Disposition Execution Act (保安處分執行法) due to the frequent mistreatment and murders of some psychiatric hospital patients. Apart from the revision to the Code of Criminal Procedures and its temporary custodial placement system, the most important change was in the implementation of Article 87 — which was originally based on the German criminal code — adjusting the duration of state guardianship from five years to potentially indefinitely, although annual professional psychiatric evaluations are to be performed to decide whether patients with psychiatric disorders should be discharged, as part of upholding their human rights.
Taiwan seems to be going in the opposite direction. For decades, the revision of Article 87 on the extensions of custodial placement was delayed, and the code had gone unrevised.
To this day, even after a prolonged fight to pass the bill in 2022 and calls to create 480 special judicial psychiatric beds throughout the nation before next year, there are still only 30 beds nationwide — all of them at Kaohsiung Municipal Kai-syuan Psychiatric Hospital.
As for Chien, who was convicted of murder in May and not granted ward status, he was sent from Keelung to the Kaohsiung facility, more than 370km away.
Additionally, state ward placements are only carried out by district prosecutors’ offices through contractual commission by a hospital within the district’s jurisdiction. This system has several disadvantages, and there are several studies on the topic. The biggest findings are that treatments at different hospitals come out to an average monthly low-end cost of about NT$10,000 to NT$20,000 to a higher-end cost of about NT$80,000 to NT$90,000 per person.
There are also safety considerations when a psychiatric patient in criminal custody is mixed with the general patient population. The nation has also failed to set up regular evaluation mechanisms for custodial placements. No training mechanism exists for specialized judicial appraisals nor the integration of the criminal justice system into the nation’s psychiatric care network. It is lamentable that these issues have gone unaddressed.
Custody of criminals with psychiatric disorders needs to be frequently reflected in the improvement and implementation of the criminal justice system, with risk management and control serving as the foundation for secure custodial placements under the criminal code.
We cannot simply lean on long-term exploitation or limit the freedoms of criminals trying to earn merit. The government’s response must be to quickly establish specialized judicially appointed psychiatric facilities, and supportive services and mechanisms.
Chao Hsuey-wen is a lecturer at Soochow University and a doctoral candidate in Fu Jen Catholic University’s Department of Law.
Translated by Tim Smith
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS