The first reactor at the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County is to be decommissioned on July 27, bringing Taiwan one step closer to becoming a “ nuclear-free” country, but also raising concern over the risks of an electricity shortage.
Following the expiration of the operating licenses of the reactors of the Jinshan and Guosheng nuclear power plants in New Taipei City between 2018 and last year, the government recently finalized the shutdown of the first reactor of the Ma-anshan plant, which would reduce the country’s electricity generation by 6 percent, or about 15 terrawatt-hours a year.
On Monday, the Ministry of Economic Affairs released its latest report on the nation’s power consumption, forecasting that it would increase at a faster compound annual growth rate of 2.8 percent over the next 10 years — versus its original estimate of 2 percent — driven mainly by a surge in power usage by artificial intelligence devices and climate change.
Facing the escalating demand for electricity and the nation’s goal of achieving zero carbon emissions by 2050, calls have been growing to extend the service life of nuclear power plants — similar to how the US extended 50 nuclear power plants’ lifespan by 40 years. Even President William Lai (賴清德) has said that he would not rule out “the use of safe, waste-free nuclear power” as a backup in case of emergency.
However, nuclear power has long been politicized in Taiwan. The nation’s first three plants were built during the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) military dictatorship, which were not only an ambitious conflation of developing nuclear energy and nuclear weapons, but also prioritized economic development over human rights and environmental justice.
Following the meltdown of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Japan in 2011, then-president Ma Ying-Jeou (馬英九) of the KMT rejected nuclear power plant extension plans proposed by the Cabinet and vowed to reduce the use of nuclear power in Taiwan. In 2016, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government further pledged to make Taiwan a “nuclear-free homeland” by 2025, which later was postponed to 2026.
Taiwan has also long been stuck on the issue of how to dispose of spent nuclear rods and waste. No matter which party was in power, no long-term nuclear waste storage projects could get a green light. All parties should share the responsibility of making the life extension of nuclear power plants almost impossible.
The DPP government proposed building dry storage sites for spent fuel from the Jinshan and Guosheng plants to maintain their operations and possibly prolong their lifespan, but New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) of the KMT opposed their construction by disapproving their water and soil conservation plans. This delayed the completion of the storage sites, leading to an upfront termination of the two plants’ nuclear reactors before their licenses expired as their used-fuel pools were overloaded.
Even if the legislature had passed the KMT’s proposed amendment to the Nuclear Reactor Facility Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) last year and eased regulations governing the license renewal of nuclear power plants, it would take up to five years to process license extensions and review safety requirements.
Taiwan is at a crucial point of deciding whether nuclear power plants should be completely decommissioned or partially extended in case of need, or to research more advanced and safer nuclear facilities that might be an option in the future. The decision should be based on professional technological expertise and pragmatic feasibility devoid of political interference.
The government also needs to work out a new energy road map to scale up power generation from renewable sources of energy, as well as encourage energy saving, to secure the nation’s energy supply.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS