The first reactor at the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County is to be decommissioned on July 27, bringing Taiwan one step closer to becoming a “ nuclear-free” country, but also raising concern over the risks of an electricity shortage.
Following the expiration of the operating licenses of the reactors of the Jinshan and Guosheng nuclear power plants in New Taipei City between 2018 and last year, the government recently finalized the shutdown of the first reactor of the Ma-anshan plant, which would reduce the country’s electricity generation by 6 percent, or about 15 terrawatt-hours a year.
On Monday, the Ministry of Economic Affairs released its latest report on the nation’s power consumption, forecasting that it would increase at a faster compound annual growth rate of 2.8 percent over the next 10 years — versus its original estimate of 2 percent — driven mainly by a surge in power usage by artificial intelligence devices and climate change.
Facing the escalating demand for electricity and the nation’s goal of achieving zero carbon emissions by 2050, calls have been growing to extend the service life of nuclear power plants — similar to how the US extended 50 nuclear power plants’ lifespan by 40 years. Even President William Lai (賴清德) has said that he would not rule out “the use of safe, waste-free nuclear power” as a backup in case of emergency.
However, nuclear power has long been politicized in Taiwan. The nation’s first three plants were built during the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) military dictatorship, which were not only an ambitious conflation of developing nuclear energy and nuclear weapons, but also prioritized economic development over human rights and environmental justice.
Following the meltdown of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Japan in 2011, then-president Ma Ying-Jeou (馬英九) of the KMT rejected nuclear power plant extension plans proposed by the Cabinet and vowed to reduce the use of nuclear power in Taiwan. In 2016, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government further pledged to make Taiwan a “nuclear-free homeland” by 2025, which later was postponed to 2026.
Taiwan has also long been stuck on the issue of how to dispose of spent nuclear rods and waste. No matter which party was in power, no long-term nuclear waste storage projects could get a green light. All parties should share the responsibility of making the life extension of nuclear power plants almost impossible.
The DPP government proposed building dry storage sites for spent fuel from the Jinshan and Guosheng plants to maintain their operations and possibly prolong their lifespan, but New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) of the KMT opposed their construction by disapproving their water and soil conservation plans. This delayed the completion of the storage sites, leading to an upfront termination of the two plants’ nuclear reactors before their licenses expired as their used-fuel pools were overloaded.
Even if the legislature had passed the KMT’s proposed amendment to the Nuclear Reactor Facility Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) last year and eased regulations governing the license renewal of nuclear power plants, it would take up to five years to process license extensions and review safety requirements.
Taiwan is at a crucial point of deciding whether nuclear power plants should be completely decommissioned or partially extended in case of need, or to research more advanced and safer nuclear facilities that might be an option in the future. The decision should be based on professional technological expertise and pragmatic feasibility devoid of political interference.
The government also needs to work out a new energy road map to scale up power generation from renewable sources of energy, as well as encourage energy saving, to secure the nation’s energy supply.
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
Historically, in Taiwan, and in present-day China, many people advocate the idea of a “great Chinese nation.” It is not worth arguing with extremists to say that the so-called “great Chinese nation” is a fabricated political myth rather than an academic term. Rather, they should read the following excerpt from Chinese writer Lin Yutang’s (林語堂) book My Country and My People: “It is also inevitable that I should offend many writers about China, especially my own countrymen and great patriots. These great patriots — I have nothing to do with them, for their god is not my god, and their patriotism is
RSS