Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) politicians are drooling over the case in which senior Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) politician Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) is suspected of taking a bribe when he was Taoyuan mayor.
His tenure was from 2014 to 2022.
WHAT HAPPENED?
Cheng was released on bail twice last week, but was denied bail on Friday.
Immediately after Cheng was first granted bail, KMT Taoyuan City Councilor Ling Tao (凌濤) dug up that the father of the judge who granted the bail used to be one of Cheng’s political advisers.
Ling insulted the judge by suggesting that he granted bail based on his connection with Cheng.
DISTORTION
Later, KMT Taipei City Councilor Yu Shu-hui (游淑慧) over-interpreted a remark that President William Lai (賴清德) made on July 6 in response to a reporter’s question.
Yu interpreted his remark as meaning that “Lai is a ruthless person.”
She suggested that the case against Cheng involves political infighting within the DPP.
Yu said that Lai is worried that Cheng could threaten his chances of being re-elected in 2028.
Yu alleged that when Lai said that cracking down on corruption is an important task for the government, he was implying that Cheng is guilty of corruption.
SPECULATION
These two KMT politicians — Ling and Yu — are making things up as they go along. As well as maligning Taiwan’s judiciary, they have also insulted the president who was elected by Taiwanese.
These two politicians’ remarks show how political disruptions in Taiwan are being stirred up for ulterior motives.
FAIR JUDGEMENT
Cheng’s case is being investigated and no charges have been filed against him yet.
Even if he is charged, he would not necessarily be convicted and the judicial process should be respected.
Cheng should be given the right to fair treatment.
It is normal for judges to decide whether to grant bail based on consideration of the conditions, so it is wrong to use insinuations about “connections” to insist that a bail should not be granted.
As for Yu’s suggestion that Lai’s words were meant to “deliberately incriminate” Cheng, her purpose was to sully the president’s personality and undermine the public’s trust in the head of state.
“Cracking down on fraud, gangs and corruption are important tasks for the government,” Lai told the reporter.
As well as mentioning “cracking down on corruption,” Lai also said that prosecutors should investigate any kind of illegal activity.
Yu’s cherry-picking what Lai said out of context was an obvious attempt to stir up trouble for political gain.
It was a very sneaky move.
CASE ONGOING
It seems strange that the prosecutors have chosen this moment to broaden the investigation of a seven-year-old case.
When handling legal cases, a judgement should be based on the evidence.
It is not acceptable to speculate or take shortcuts.
To handle a case based on which way the wind is blowing is a major taboo in the judicial world.
The public are watching this case with open eyes, and they are unlikely to allow powerful people to play games.
Chen Chi-nung works in the field of culture and history.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS