The Constitutional Court on Wednesday last week held a preparatory hearing for an injunction request to halt the enforcement of controversial new amendments to government oversight laws.
Constitutional Court oral arguments are scheduled for Aug. 6 on the constitutionality of amendments to the Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法) and the Criminal Code, which were passed on May 28 by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers.
The amendments were signed into law on June 24 and promulgated on June 26.
However, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislative caucus, the Executive Yuan, President William Lai (賴清德) and the Control Yuan separately filed for a ruling on the constitutionality of the amendments, and also petitioned for an injunction.
Fifteen Constitutional Court justices were present at the hearing, which was broadcast live, and legal representatives of the four petitioners and the Legislative Yuan presented their claims and counterclaims.
Legal representatives of the four petitioners said the amendments have major flaws and are likely to cause irreparable harm to the Constitutional order.
They said the amendments pose dangers to the semi-presidential system, the separation of powers, responsible politics, and the judiciary and Control Yuan’s investigative and adjudicative powers, while the disclosure of confidential government information would cause irreparable harm.
The legislature’s representatives said the amendments aim to strengthen popular sovereignty, responsible politics and improve the quality of the Legislative Yuan’s decisions.
The amendments would not cause any irreparable harm to the constitutional order, they said.
After the three-hour hearing, some KMT lawmakers said they did not have enough time to prepare and the Cabinet should not be allowed to file for a Constitutional interpretation after the legislature rejected its request for reconsideration.
Some KMT lawmakers complained that the legislature’s representatives were asked by a justice whether lawmakers have legal supremacy over the Executive Yuan and the Constitutional Court.
TPP caucus whip Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) failed to answer a justice’s question on the definition of “counterquestioning” which was mentioned in the amendments.
It is concerning that KMT and TPP lawmakers are already trying to discredit the justices, with Huang beginning his presentation by showing a slide that reads “court justices shouldn’t be the guardian deity of a certain political party,” and telling reporters that the “host, cohost and referees” are on the same side and “everyone who watched the broadcast could see the justices had a stance.”
KMT Legislator Wu Tsung-hsien (吳宗憲) said it was unfair that the four petitioners had more representatives in total than the legislature, while fellow KMT Legislator Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲) said it was an unfair trial, which the opposition parties did not have time to prepare for, and they felt “besieged.”
However, ironically, the opposition’s amendments require the president and public officials to immediately answer their questions with no time to prepare.
Despite tens of thousands of protesters’ and hundreds of legal experts’ calls to halt the amendments so that there could be sufficient discussion, the opposition passed them. When asked by a reporter about the definition of “counterquestioning,” Wu said the opposition would “properly explain [the definition] to the people after the bills become laws,” underlining the ambiguity of the amendments.
The opposition lawmakers’ remarks only highlight how they rushed to push through the amendments, disregarding any calls for further deliberation.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS