On July 4, the Ministry of Digital Affairs and Meta Platforms Inc, met to discuss anti-fraud measures. Meta said it would support anti-fraud campaigns and commit to preventing fraud on its online advertising platform. They also pledged to establish communication channels with the ministry and prioritize removing high-risk fraudulent accounts and advertisements. After several years of the government running around in circles, President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration, in its second month, has gotten Meta to sit down and address the negative effects of online fraud on Taiwanese. This is not an easy feat and deserves some praise.
However, after the pledge was released, many fraudulent ads were promoted on the platform. A common scam on Facebook is someone impersonating Taiwan Research Institute (TRI, 台灣綜合研究院) founder Liu Tai-ying (劉泰英) to advertise books on investment tips. Another page posted an even more outrageous photo of Lai and former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) promoting fur seal pills.
Although the ministry has already launched a dedicated anti-fraud reporting channel for public figures, these absurd fraudulent ads create a “broken window” effect. It plans to launch an anti-fraud reporting and inquiry platform next month, which would instantly direct reported suspicious messages to the appropriate government agencies. It seems impressive, but it is still a “passive” method of reporting and checking cases. Ultimately, many important administrative tasks would fall on public servants who already have their hands full.
The reason why algorithms continue to promote fraudulent ads is simple: “Money talks.” Platform operators receive compensation to carry out promotional activities. Curbing these occurrences requires getting to the root of the problem. To effectively manage fraudulent ads, platforms that receive compensation for promoting them must be regulated in accordance with the law.
The Executive Yuan in May passed draft bills for fraud prevention, and science and technology investigation, as well as draft amendments to the Communication Security and Surveillance Act (通訊保障及監察法) and Money Laundering Control Act (洗錢防制法). The drafts have been submitted to the Legislative Yuan.
After the turmoil in the legislature since May, it is hoped that the Legislative Yuan can complete their review as soon as possible, providing law enforcement with more effective legal tools to combat online fraud and create a healthier, more reliable digital environment.
Lo Cheng-chung is a professor and director of Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology’s Institute of Financial and Economic Law.
Translated by Nicole Wong
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS