On July 4, the Ministry of Digital Affairs and Meta Platforms Inc, met to discuss anti-fraud measures. Meta said it would support anti-fraud campaigns and commit to preventing fraud on its online advertising platform. They also pledged to establish communication channels with the ministry and prioritize removing high-risk fraudulent accounts and advertisements. After several years of the government running around in circles, President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration, in its second month, has gotten Meta to sit down and address the negative effects of online fraud on Taiwanese. This is not an easy feat and deserves some praise.
However, after the pledge was released, many fraudulent ads were promoted on the platform. A common scam on Facebook is someone impersonating Taiwan Research Institute (TRI, 台灣綜合研究院) founder Liu Tai-ying (劉泰英) to advertise books on investment tips. Another page posted an even more outrageous photo of Lai and former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) promoting fur seal pills.
Although the ministry has already launched a dedicated anti-fraud reporting channel for public figures, these absurd fraudulent ads create a “broken window” effect. It plans to launch an anti-fraud reporting and inquiry platform next month, which would instantly direct reported suspicious messages to the appropriate government agencies. It seems impressive, but it is still a “passive” method of reporting and checking cases. Ultimately, many important administrative tasks would fall on public servants who already have their hands full.
The reason why algorithms continue to promote fraudulent ads is simple: “Money talks.” Platform operators receive compensation to carry out promotional activities. Curbing these occurrences requires getting to the root of the problem. To effectively manage fraudulent ads, platforms that receive compensation for promoting them must be regulated in accordance with the law.
The Executive Yuan in May passed draft bills for fraud prevention, and science and technology investigation, as well as draft amendments to the Communication Security and Surveillance Act (通訊保障及監察法) and Money Laundering Control Act (洗錢防制法). The drafts have been submitted to the Legislative Yuan.
After the turmoil in the legislature since May, it is hoped that the Legislative Yuan can complete their review as soon as possible, providing law enforcement with more effective legal tools to combat online fraud and create a healthier, more reliable digital environment.
Lo Cheng-chung is a professor and director of Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology’s Institute of Financial and Economic Law.
Translated by Nicole Wong
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS